Public Policy in the Context of Political, Military, and Financial Risks: Challenges and Ways of Implementation
Abstract
The purpose of article is to provide a comprehensive analysis of the main challenges and opportunities for implementing public policy in the context of political, military, and financial instability. The study is based on qualitative approach, using expert opinions, literature analysis, and review articles for a comprehensive understanding of risks and their impact on public policies. The main emphasis is placed on the content analysis of literature sources, which allows for a broader understanding of the public policy phenomenon. The results demonstrate that the ability of the system to effectively regulate and anticipate conflicts and crises significantly affects the country’s domestic and foreign policy course, as well as the effectiveness of political governance. The authors emphasise that political conflicts, as an integral part of political life, determine the nature of public space and interaction between the government and society. The results of the study indicate a significant impact of geopolitical crises on the internal affairs of the country and the need to adapt public policy to new conditions. The emphasis is placed on the role of the authorities in ensuring sustainable development and a decisive response to challenges of risky environment. The conclusions determine that effective solution of complex public policy tasks in the context of risks requires a comprehensive approach, involvement of civil society, partnerships between the government and citizens. The article emphasises the importance of democratic principles, decentralisation, and international cooperation as key factors for the successful implementation of public policy in the context of heightened risks.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
BEREZIUK, Sergiy; PRONKO, Lyudmila; SAMBORSKA, Oksana. The phenomenon of political power in ukraine. European Journal of Sustainable Development, vol. 9, no. 2, p. 488-500, 1 June 2020. Available from: https://doi.org/10.14207/ejsd.2020.v9n2p488. Accessed: 15 Jan. 2024.
BIRKLAND, Thomas A. Introduction to the policy process: theories, concepts, and models of public policy making. [S. l.]: Taylor & Francis Group, 2019. 430 p. ISBN 9781351023917.
BORYSENKO, Olha. Service oriented model of the Public Policy for Employment in Ukraine: innovative approaches. Public administration and local government, no. 4(43), p. 37-43, 25 Dec. 2019. Available from: https://doi.org/10.33287/101905. Accessed: 15 Jan. 2024.
BOVAIRD, Tony; LOEFFLER, Elke. The changing context of public policy. In: BOVAIRD, Tony; LOEFFLER, Elke. Public management and governance. 4th ed. London: Routledge, 2023. p. 14-26. ISBN 9781003282839. Available from: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003282839-3. Accessed: 15 Jan. 2024.
BURIAK, I.; SKALETSKA, Z.; REZVOROVYCH, K.; GIGIN, O. Future legal culture as an element of the legal system. Futurity Economics&Law, [S. l.], v. 3, n. 2, p. 39–47, 2023. DOI: 10.57125/FEL.2023.06.25.03. Available from:: https://www.futurity-econlaw.com/index.php/FEL/article/view/115. Acessed: 15 jan. 2024.
DREW, Joseph. Selling Public Policy in Practice: Failure in Ukraine? In: DREW, Joseph. Selling Public Policy. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore, 2023. p. 141-154. ISBN 9789819903801. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-0381-8_10. Accessed: 15 Jan. 2024.
DÜR, Andreas; HAMILTON, Scott Michael; DE BIÈVRE, Dirk. Reacting to the politicization of trade policy. Journal of European Public Policy, p. 1-19, 26 Sept. 2023. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2023.2258157. Accessed: 15 Jan. 2024.
ESGUERRA MUELLE, Camila; RAMÍREZ, Jeisson Alanis Bello. Intersectionality and LGBTI Public Policies in Colombia: Uses and Displacements of a Critical Notion. In: ESGUERRA MUELLE, Camila; RAMÍREZ, Jeisson Alanis Bello. The Palgrave Handbook of Intersectionality in Public Policy. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019. p. 489-510. ISBN 9783319984728. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98473-5_22. Accessed: 15 Jan. 2024.
ISHCHUK, Natalia. Ukraine: Experience of War. Occasional Papers on Religion in Eastern Europe, vol. 42, no. 4, 1 May 2022. Available from: https://doi.org/10.55221/2693-2148.2347. Accessed: 15 Jan. 2024.
IVANOV, A. V. Social and humanitarian policy in ukraine during war. “Scientific Notes of Taurida V.I. Vernadsky University”, series “Public Administration”, no. 2, p. 61-65, 2023. Available from: https://doi.org/10.32782/tnu-2663-6468/2023.2/10. Accessed: 15 Jan. 2024.
FISCHER, Frank. Political evaluation and the problem of rational judgment. In: FISCHER, Frank. Politics, values, and public policy. [S. l.]: Routledge, 2019a. p. 65-109. ISBN 9780429302558. Available from: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429302558-3. Accessed: 15 Jan. 2024.
FISCHER, Frank. Politics, values, and public policy: the problem of methodology. [S. l.]: Taylor & Francis Group, 2019b. ISBN 9781000271683.
GHAI, Dharam. Social development and public policy: some lessons from successful experiences. In: GHAI, Dharam. Social development and public policy. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2000. p. 1-45. ISBN 9780333779125. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230374232_1. Accessed: 15 Jan. 2024.
HANKIVSKY, Olena; CORMIER, Renee. Intersectionality and Public Policy: Some Lessons from Existing Models. Political Research Quarterly, vol. 64, no. 1, p. 217-229, 25 Aug. 2010. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912910376385. Accessed: 15 Jan. 2024.
HANKIVSKY, Olena; JORDAN-ZACHERY, Julia S. Introduction: Bringing Intersectionality to Public Policy. In: HANKIVSKY, Olena; JORDAN-ZACHERY, Julia S. The Palgrave Handbook of Intersectionality in Public Policy. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019. p. 1-28. ISBN 9783319984728. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98473-5_1. Accessed: 15 Jan. 2024.
HILL, Michael. The Public Policy Process. [S. l.]: Routledge, 2014. E-book. ISBN 9781315832937. Available from: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315832937. Accessed: 15 Jan. 2024.
KHADZHYRADIEVA, Svitlana; HRECHKO, Tetiana; SMALSKYS, Vainius. Institutionalisation of Behavioural Insights in Public Policy. Public Policy And Administration, vol. 18, no. 3, p. 95-113, 9 Dec. 2019. Available from: https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.ppaa.18.3.24726. Accessed: 15 Jan. 2024.
KHALILOV, E. M. ogly. Legal status of subjects of public relations in the procedural law of the future of Azerbaijan. Futurity Economics&Law, [S. l.], v. 3, n. 1, p. 43–53, 2023. DOI: 10.57125/FEL.2023.03.25.05. Available from:: https://www.futurity-econlaw.com/index.php/FEL/article/view/78. Acessed: 15 jan. 2024.
KOMINEK, Łukasz; STAŚKIEWICZ, Urszula; MACIĄG, Mateusz. Russia-ukraine. war? New war? Old war? National Security Studies, vol. 26, no. 4, p. 11-20, 18 Aug. 2022. Available from: https://doi.org/10.37055/sbn/152883. Accessed: 15 Jan. 2024.
KUMAR , A. Analysis of the Principle of Subsidiarity as a Principle of EU Law: Future Perspectives. Futurity Economics&Law, [S. l.], v. 1, n. 4, p. 18–27, 2021. DOI: 10.57125/FEL.2021.12.25.03. Available from: https://www.futurity-econlaw.com/index.php/FEL/article/view/68. Acessed: 15 Jan. 2024.
MICHAEL, Hill; HUPE, Peter. Implementing Public Policy. [S. l.]: SAGE Publications, Limited, 2014. 248 p. ISBN 9781446266830.
MYGLEGAARD ANDERSEN, Heidi Lene. Bringing Intersectionality into Danish Public Policy. In: MYGLEGAARD ANDERSEN, Heidi Lene. The Palgrave Handbook of Intersectionality in Public Policy. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019. p. 471-488. ISBN 9783319984728. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98473-5_21. Accessed: 15 Jan. 2024.
OMELCHYK, O.; IVANASHKO, O.; SIPKO, L.; VIRNA, Z.; SAIENKO, V.; TOLCHIEVA, H. Economic behavior of consumers during instability. AD ALTA: Journal of Interdisciplinary Research, vol. 12/02-XXVIII, p. 89-95, 2022. Available from: https://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:000830963300016?SID=EUW1ED0E07zVxBkrwdh3ISpT5lPJN. Accessed: 15 Jan. 2024.
WEBER, James; LAWRENCE, Anne. Business and Society: Stakeholders, Ethics, Public Policy. [S. l.]: McGraw-Hill Education, 2019. 576 p. ISBN 9781260043662.
PROKOPENKO, O. Some aspects of the state information policy of the modern state: definitions of the future. Futurity Economics&Law, [S. l.], v. 2, n. 4, p. 60–72, 2022. DOI: 10.57125/FEL.2022.12.25.08. Available from: https://www.futurity-econlaw.com/index.php/FEL/article/view/72. Acessed em: 15 Jan. 2024.
REZVOROVYCH, K.; SKALETSKA, Z.; DOROSHEVA , A.; SUSHYTSKA , Y. Application of law as a special form of its implementation: trends for the future. Futurity Economics&Law, [S. l.], v. 3, n. 1, p. 28–35, 2023. DOI: 10.57125/FEL.2023.03.25.03. Available from: https://www.futurity-econlaw.com/index.php/FEL/article/view/76. Acessed: 15 jan. 2024.
RUSSELL, James A. U.S. Foreign Policy and the War in Ukraine. Transatlantic Policy Quarterly, vol. 21, no. 4, p. 95-106, 1 Mar. 2023. Available from: https://doi.org/10.58867/pkud8310. Accessed: 15 Jan. 2024.
WILLETT, Marcus. The Cyber Dimension of the Russia–Ukraine War. Survival, vol. 64, no. 5, p. 7-26, 3 Sept. 2022. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/00396338.2022.2126193. Accessed: 15 Jan. 2024.
ZHELYAZKOVA, Asya et al. Differentiated policy implementation in the European Union. West European Politics, p. 1-27, 17 Oct. 2023. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2023.2257963. Accessed: 15 Jan. 2024.
ZUBKO, Artem. Public policy of ukraine: concept and essence. Entrepreneurship, Economy and Law, no. 3, p. 91-95, 2022. Available from: https://doi.org/10.32849/2663-5313/2022.3.13. Accessed: 15 Jan. 2024.
ZÚÑIGA, Jesús. Designing Public Policies: Principles and Instruments. Revista Estudiantil Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales, vol. 13, no. 02, p. 1-7, 15 Oct. 2018. Available from: https://doi.org/10.18504/rl0213-008-2018. Accessed: 15 Jan. 2024.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18256/2238-0604.2023.v19i3.4981
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
ISSN 2238-0604
This Revista Brasileira de Direito is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Indexers
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ||
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ||
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ||
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ||
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ||
![]() | ![]() |