Justice of judicial procedure: conceptual basis and national characteristics

Nataliya Shelever; Oleksandr Rogach; Olha Antalovtsi; Diana Voron; Victoria Pylyp

doi:10.18256/2238-0604.2024.v20i1.4987

Autores

Nataliya Shelever PhD in Law, Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Department of Administrative, Financial and Informative Law, State University «Uzhhorod National University», Uzhhorod (Ukraine). https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3641-4910
Oleksandr Rogach Doctor of Legal Sciences, Professor, Professor, Vice-Rector for Academic Policy and Research, State University “Uzhhorod National University”, Uzhhorod (Ukraine). https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5125-288X
Olha Antalovtsi PhD in Law, Associate Professor of the Department of Public Health, Faculty of Postgraduate Education and Pre-University training, State University «Uzhhorod National University», Uzhhorod (Ukraine). https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8796-8855
Diana Voron Candidate of legal science, Associate Professor of the Department of Administrative, Financial and Informative Law, State University «Uzhhorod National University», Uzhhorod (Ukraine). https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0522-1921
Victoria Pylyp Candidate of legal science, Associate Professor of the Department of Administrative, Financial and Informative Law, State University «Uzhhorod National University», Uzhhorod (Ukraine) https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6483-0749

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18256/2238-0604.2024.v20i1.4987

Palavras-chave:

judiciary, right to a fair trial, access to justice, electronic court, European Court of Human Rights

Resumo

The study is a scientific analysis of the criteria for the effectiveness of justice, the features of the implementation of the constitutional right to a fair trial, the determination of its legal nature and normative consolidation at the international and national levels, the study of the positive experience of applying the precedent practice of the European Court of Human Rights in order to solve the main problems of fair justice in Ukraine . It was emphasized that the process of administering fair justice combines legal and social foundations, and also requires proper economic and organizational technical support. It was concluded that elements of the right to a fair trial, such as territorial jurisdiction of cases, compliance with reasonable investigation deadlines, remote court proceedings in the conditions of martial law introduced in Ukraine, require an immediate and at the same time comprehensive approach in order to create the necessary and at the same time comfortable conditions for the effective resolution of the dispute, ensuring continuous functioning of the judicial system.

Downloads

Os dados de download ainda não estão disponíveis.

Biografia do Autor

Nataliya Shelever, PhD in Law, Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Department of Administrative, Financial and Informative Law, State University «Uzhhorod National University», Uzhhorod (Ukraine).

PhD in Law, Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Department of Administrative, Financial and Informative Law, State University «Uzhhorod National University», Uzhhorod (Ukraine).
Oleksandr Rogach, Doctor of Legal Sciences, Professor, Professor, Vice-Rector for Academic Policy and Research, State University “Uzhhorod National University”, Uzhhorod (Ukraine).

Doctor of Legal Sciences, Professor, Professor, Vice-Rector for Academic Policy and Research, State University “Uzhhorod National University”, Uzhhorod (Ukraine).
Olha Antalovtsi, PhD in Law, Associate Professor of the Department of Public Health, Faculty of Postgraduate Education and Pre-University training, State University «Uzhhorod National University», Uzhhorod (Ukraine).

PhD in Law, Associate Professor of the Department of Public Health, Faculty of Postgraduate Education and Pre-University training, State University «Uzhhorod National University», Uzhhorod (Ukraine).
Diana Voron, Candidate of legal science, Associate Professor of the Department of Administrative, Financial and Informative Law, State University «Uzhhorod National University», Uzhhorod (Ukraine).

Candidate of legal science, Associate Professor of the Department of Administrative, Financial and Informative Law, State University «Uzhhorod National University», Uzhhorod (Ukraine).
Victoria Pylyp, Candidate of legal science, Associate Professor of the Department of Administrative, Financial and Informative Law, State University «Uzhhorod National University», Uzhhorod (Ukraine)

Candidate of legal science, Associate Professor of the Department of Administrative, Financial and Informative Law, StateUniversity«UzhhorodNationalUniversity», Uzhhorod (Ukraine)

Referências

ADYGEZALOVA, G.; ZHINKIN, S.; KICH, I.; BUTKO, L.; VYSOTSKAYA, L. “Effectiveness of legislation and implementation of the rule of law”. Questiones Políticas. 2022. Vol. 40. No. 72. p. 774–784.

BERNYUKOV, A.; BIGUN, V.; LOBODA, Yu.; MALYSHEV, B.; POGREBNYAK, S.; RABINOVYCH, S.; SMORODYNSKYI, V.; STOVBA, O. Justice: philosophical and theoretical understanding. Collective monograph. Kyive. 2009. 316.

Constitution of Ukraine. Law of Ukraine. 28 June, 1996, No. 254к/96-ВР. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/254%D0%BA/96-%D0%B2%D1%80#Text.

Decision of the Council of Judges of Ukraine No. 79 of November 19, 2018 “Regarding the problems of introducing an electronic court.” http://rsu.gov.ua/en/events/risennarsuno79-vid-19-listopada-2018-roku-sodo-problem-zaprovadzenna-elektronnogosudu.

DIDENKO, N.; KOZLOV, R. Philosophical and psychological problems of social interaction in the system of modern management. Monograph. 2019. 194.

IVANCHENKO, O. System of criteria for evaluating the effectiveness of courts during the provision of court services. Entrepreneurship, economy and law. 2017. No. 11. p. 222–225. http://pgp-journal.kiev.ua/archive/2017/11/48.pdf.

KOLICH, O. Peculiarities of social interaction in the judicial process. Legal scientific electronic journal. 2022. No. 10/2022. P. 37–39.

KOLICH, O. Social effectiveness of justice and its improvement. Bulletin of the Lviv Polytechnic National University. No. 3 (35). 2022. p. 66–73.

LEMAK, O. The right to judicial protection: constitutional and legal aspect. Thesis abstract. Kharkiv, 2014. 20.

MEDVEDEV, K. Judiciary during the war: what changes are provided by the adopted Law (project 7315). 2022. https://jurliga.ligazakon.net/ru/news/212847_sudochinstvo-pd-chas-vyni-yak-zmni-peredbacheno-ukhvalenim-zakonom-proektom-7315.

On amendments to the law of Ukraine “On the judiciary and the status of judges”. Law of Ukraine. 2 June, 2016. No. 2461-IX. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2461-20#Text.

On the judiciary and the status of judges. Law of Ukraine. 2 June, 2016. No. 1402-VIII. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1402-19.

On the Legal Regime of Martial Law. Law of Ukraine. 12 May, 2015. No. 389-VIII. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/389-19#Text.

SEREDENKO, K. “Fair court” in the understanding of the European Court of Human Rights. Materials of the “round table” The role of the practice of the European Court of Human Rights in affirming the principle of the rule of law. Mykolaiv, December 8, 2016. p. 24.

SHCHERBAK, S.; KOZHEVNIKOVA, A. Electronicization of the judiciary: the current state and guidelines for the development of the electronic court in Ukraine in the light of the civil process. Legal scientific electronic journal. Zaporizhzhia, 2023, No. 4. p. 238–242.

SHELEVER, N. Peculiarities of ensuring the constitutional right to a fair trial during the war. Scientific bulletin of Uzhhorod National University, 2022. p. 104–107.

TATULYCH, I. Peculiarities of judicial proceedings under martial law. 2022. https://law.chnu.edu.ua/osoblyvosti-zdiisnennia-sudochynstva-v-umovakh-voiennoho-stanu.

TREGUBOV, E. The right to a fair trial in the practice of the European Court of Human Rights. Law forum. 2010. No. 1. p. 358–363. http://www.nbuv.gov.ua/e-journals/FP/2010-1/10telzpl.pdf.

TSVIK, M., TKACHENKO, V., PETRYSHYN, O. The general theory of the state and law. Kharkiv: Pravo, 2002.