Enviar artigo via e-mail 
A pretensão de correção e a limitação moral sobre o direito: uma crítica a tese da separação
Resumo
O presente artigo explica a pretensão de correção e os seus efeitos limitadores sobre o Direito, de acordo com a teoria do direito de Robert Alexy. Para apresentar isso, na primeira seção é apresentado o conceito e a natureza normativa da pretensão de correção na visão de Robert Alexy. Na segunda seção são apresentadas as respostas de Eugenio Bulygin e Joseph Raz à pretensão de correção. Na terceira seção é conectada a pretensão de correção à ideia de lmitações morais para, no final, na quarta seção, ser apresentadas considerações sobre a pretensão de correção, em especial, proposta para reduzir o grau de arbitrariedade e injustiça no direito.
Palavras-chave
Texto completo:
PDF (English)Referências
ALLAN, Trevor. “In Defence of Radbruch’s Formula: Injustice, Interpretation and Invalidity”. In: BOROWSKI, Martin, et al., Rechtsphilosophie und Grundrechtstheorie. Robert Alexys System, Tubingen, Mohr Siebeck, 2017: 87-104.
ALEXY, Robert. Theorie der juristischen Argumentation. Die Theorie des rationalen Diskurses als Theorie der juristischen Begründung, Frankfurt am Main, Suhrkamp, 1978.
ALEXY, Robert. Theorie der Grundrechte, Frankfurt am Main, Suhrkamp, 1985.
ALEXY, Robert. Begriff und Geltung des Rechts, München/Freiburg, Karl Alber, 1992.
ALEXY, Robert. “Law and Correctness”. In: Current Legal Problems 51, 1998. p. 205-221.
ALEXY, Robert. “The Nature of the Arguments about the Nature of Law”. In: MEYER, Lukas, et al., Rights, Culture and the Law. Themes from the Legal and Political Philosophy of Joseph Raz, Cambridge, Oxford University Press, 2003. p. 3-16.
ALEXY, Robert. “On the Concept and Nature of Law”. Ratio Juris, v. 21, n. 3, 2008. p. 281-299.
ALEXY, Robert. “Die Natur der Rechtsphilosophie”. In: BRUGGER, Winfried, et al., Rechtsphilosophie im 21 Jahrhundert, Frankfurt am Main, Suhrkamp, 2008. p. 11-25.
ALEXY, Robert. “Algunas reflexiones en torno a cómo mi pensamiento jurídico ha ido desarrollándose con el paso de los años”. In: BERNAL, Carlos (Ed), La doble dimensión del derecho. Autoridad y razón en la obra de Robert Alexy, Lima, Palestra, 2011. p. 59-87.
ALEXY, Robert. The Argument from Injustice. A Reply to Legal Positivism, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2011.
ALEXY, Robert. “Law, Morality, and the Existence of Human Rights”. Ratio Juris. v. 25, n. 1, 2012. p. 2-14.
AUSTIN, John. How to Do Things with Words, Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1962.
BÄCKER, Carsten. Begründen und Entscheiden — Kritik und Rekonstruktion der Alexyschen Diskurstheorie des Rechts, Baden, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, 2012.
BERTRAM, Georg (Ed.). Philosophische Gedankenexperimente. Eine Lese- und Studienbuch, Stuttgart, Reclam, 2012.
BONGIOVANNI, Giorgio et al. “The Claim to Correctness and Inferentialism: Alexy’s Theory of Practical Reason Reconsidered”. In: PAVLAKOS, George (Ed.), Law, Rights and Discourse. The Legal Philosophy of Robert Alexy, Portland, Oxford University Press, 2007. p. 275-299.
BOROWSKI, Martin. “Discourse, Principles and the Problem of Law and Morality: Robert Alexy’s Three Main Works”. Jurisprudence: An International Journal of Legal and Political Thought, 2(2), 2012. p. 575-595.
BRANDOM, Robert. Making it Explicit: Reasoning, Representing and Discursive Commitment, Oxford, Harvard University Press, 1998.
BULYGIN, Eugenio. “Alexy und das Richtigkeitsargument”. In: AARNIO, Aulis, et al., Rechtsnorm und Rechtswirklichkeit. Festchrift für Werner Krawietz zum 60 Geburtstag, Duncker & Humblot, Berlin, 1993. p. 19-24.
BULYGIN, Eugenio. “Alexy’s Thesis of the Necessary Connections Between Law and Morality”. Ratio Juris, Vol. 13, Núm. 2, 2000. p. 133-137.
BULYGIN, Eugenio. “Robert Alexy und der Begriff des Rechts”. In: CLÉRICO, Laura; SIECKMANN, Jan-Reinard (Eds.), Grundrechte, Prinzipien und Argumentation. Studien zur Rechstheorie Robert Alexys, Baden-Baden, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, 2009. p. 225-236.
CASTORIADIS, Cornelius. “The Greek and the modern Political imaginary”, in, World in Fragments. Writings on Politics, Society, Psychoanalysis and Imagination. Edited and Translated by David Ames Curtis, California, Stanford University Press, 1997.
CHIASSONI, Pierluigi, “Alexy y la doble naturaleza del derecho. Comentarios escépticos”. In: BERNAL, Carlos (Ed.), La doble dimensión del derecho. Autoridad y razón en la obra de Robert Alexy, Lima, Palestra, 2011. p. 127-142.
COOKE, Maeve, “Law’s Claim to Correctness”. In: PAVLAKOS, George (Ed.), Law, Rights and Discourse. The Legal Philosophy of Robert Alexy, Portland, Oxford University Press, 2007. p. 225-247.
GAIDO, Paula. “The Place for Morality in Law. An Exchange between Robert Alexy and Joseph Raz”. In: BOROWSKI, Martin, et al., Rechtsphilosophie und Grundrechtstheorie. Robert Alexys System, Tubingen, Mohr Siebeck, 2017. p. 133-144.
GARDNER, John. “How Law Claims, What Law Claims”. In: KLATT, Matthias (Ed.), Institutionalized Reason. The Jurisprudence of Robert Alexy, New York, Oxford University Press, 2012: 29-44.
KLATT, Matthias. “Robert Alexy’s Philosophy of Law as System”. In: KLATT, Matthias (Ed.), Institutionalized Reason — The Jurisprudence of Robert Alexy, New York, Oxford University Press, 2012: 1-26.
KELSEN, Hans. Reine Rechtslehre. Studienausgabe der 1. Auflage 1934, Tubinga, Mohr Siebeck, 2008.
KELSEN, Hans. Reine Rechtslehre. Studienausgabe der 2. Auflage 1960, Tubinga, Mohr Siebeck, 2017.
MACCORMICK, Neil. “Why Law Makes no Claims”. In: PAVLAKOS, George (Ed.), Law, Rights and Discourse. The Legal Philosophy of Robert Alexy, Portland, Hart Publishing, 2007: 59-67.
NAVA, Alejandro. La institucionalización de la razón. La filosofía del derecho de Robert Alexy, Ciudad de México, Anthropos/UAM Iztapalapa, 2015.
NEUMANN, Ulfrid. “Notwendigkeit und Grenzen von Idealisierungen im Rechtsdenken”. In: BOROWSKI, Martin, et al., Rechtsphilosophie und Grundrechtstheorie. Robert Alexys System, Tubingen, Mohr Siebeck, 2017. p. 67-85.
PATZIG, Günther. Ethik ohne Metaphysik, Götingen, Vandenhoeck-Reihe, 1983.
PAVLAKOS, George. “Correctness and Cognitivism. Remarks on Robert Alexy’s Argument from the Claim to Correctness”. Ratio Juris, Vol. 25 No. 1 March 2012: 15-30.
RAZ, Joseph. “The Argument from Justice or How Not to Reply to Legal Positivism”. In: PAVLAKOS, George (Ed.), Law, Rights and Discourse. The Legal Philosophy of Robert Alexy, Portland, Hart Publishing, 2007: 17-35.
RAZ, Joseph. The Authority of Law, Essays on Law and Morality, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2009.
RADBRUCH, Gustav. “Gesetzliches Recht und übergesetzliches Recht”. In: RADBRUCH, Gustav, Rechtsphilosophie, Heidelberg, C. F. Müller, 2003. p. 211-219.
REHG, William. Insight and Solidarity — The Discourse Ethics of Jürgen Habermas, California, University of California Press, 1994.
SEARLE, John. Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1970.
SIECKMANN, Jan-Reinard. “Human Rights and the Claim to Correctness in the Theory of Robert Alexy”. In: PAVLAKOS, George, Law, Rights and Discourse: The Legal Philosophy of Robert Alexy, Portland, Hart Publishing, 2007. p. 189-205.
SIECKMANN, Jan-Reinard. “La tesis de la naturaleza dual en la teoría del derecho de Robert Alexy”. In: BERNAL, Carlos (Ed.), La doble dimensión del derecho. Autoridad y razón en la obra de Robert Alexy, Lima, Palestra editores, 2011. p. 89-126.
SIECKMANN, Jan-Reinard. La teoría del derecho de Robert Alexy. Análisis y crítica, Bogotá, Universidad Externado de Colombia, 2014.
SOPER, Philip. “Law’s Normative Claims”. In: GEORGE, Robert (Ed.), The Autonomy of Law. Essays on Legal Positivism, Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1996: 215-248.
TURNER, Stephen. Explaining the Normative, Cambridge, Polity Press, 2010.
NIDA-RÜMELIN, Julian. “Politische Ethik I”. In: NIDA-RÜMELIN, Julian (ed.), Angewandte Ethik. Die Bereichsethiken und ihre theoretische Fundierung, Stuttgart, Alfred Kröner Verlag, 1996: 140-155.
WALDRON, Jeremy. Law and Disagreement, Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1999.
WILLIAMS, Bernard. Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy, Cambridge, Harvard University Press, 1985.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18256/2238-0604.2019.v15i3.3444
Apontamentos
- Não há apontamentos.
