Brazilian and Japanese Perspective of Environmental Damage

Grace Ladeira Garbaccio, Jeferson Dytz Marin, Tadashi Otsuka

Resumen


The constitutionalization of the environment without normative density that allows us to know exactly what is the object of protection requires a more detailed study in order to verify the portion of reality that is protected by the constitutional norm. Added to this, there is the fact that the Brazilian  Constitution adds to the still undetermined concept of the environment the quality of the ecological balance, which makes an interdisciplinary approach necessary. The notions of environment and environmental good, although relevant, are insufficient to determine the scope of protection of that fundamental right. For this, it is appropriate to use the concept of environmental damage, associated with a technical analysis, for the correct application of the Brazilian and Japanese Major Law and adequate Brazilian and Japanese protection of the environment. Thus, the research is inserted in the logical deductive method, using the bibliographic reference search procedure and the qualitative approach.

 


Palabras clave


Environmental damage; Environmental good; Tolerability Limits; Ecological balance; Brazil and Japan

Texto completo:

PDF (English)

Referencias


AWAJI, TAKEHISA, Theory of Environmental Right and Judgments, Yuhikaku, 1980.

BAHIA, Carolina Medeiros. Nexo de Causalidade em Face do Risco e do Dano ao Meio Ambiente: elementos para um novo tratamento da causalidade no sistema brasileiro de responsabilidade ambiental. Tese (Doutorado) – Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina. Florianópolis, 2012. 377 p.

BAGGIO, A.; SCHEFFER-BASSO, S. M.; JACQUES, A.V. A. A estética do ecossistema: reeducando o antropocentrismo. Rev. Ecossistema. Vol. 27, n. 12, jan./dez. 2002.

CANOTILHO, J. J. G.; MENDES, G. F.; SARLET, I. W.; STRECK, L. L. (Coords.). Comentários à Constituição do Brasil. São Paulo: Saraiva/Almedina, 2013.

CAVALIERI FILHO, Sérgio. Programa de Responsabilidade Civil. 2.ed. São Paulo: Malheiros, 2000.

GAGLIANO, Pablo Stolze; PAMPLONA FILHO, Rodolfo. Novo Curso de Direito Civil: responsabilidade civil. 8. ed. São Paulo: Saraiva, 2010.

GAVIÃO FILHO, Anizio Pires. Direito Fundamental ao Ambiente. Porto Alegre: Livraria do Advogado, 2005.

HARASHIMA, Shigeyoshi, Development and Injunction Demand, Kyudai Hosei Kenkyu vol.46, n.2-4, 1980.

HATAKEYAMA, Takemichi, Environmental Right, and Environment and Information/ Participation, Hogaku Kyoshitsu, vol. 269, 2003.

LEITE, José Rubens Morato. Dano Ambiental: do individual ao coletivo extrapatrimonial. 2. ed. São Paulo: Revista dos Tribunais, 2003.

MATSUMOTO, Kazuhiko, Protection of the Environment as Protection of Right, Handai Hogaku, vol.64, n.3=4. 2014.

MATSUMOTO, Kazuhiko, Protection of the Environment as a Constitutional Issue in NORIKO OKUBO et al. (ed.), Contemporary Development of the Environmental Regulation, Horitsu Bunkasha, 2019.

MIRAGEM, Bruno. O artigo 1.228 do Código Civil e os deveres do proprietário em matéria de preservação do meio ambiente. Revista de informação legislativa, v. 42, n. 168, p. 101-120, out./dez. 2005.

NEBEL, B. J; WRIGHT, R. T. Ciencias Ambientales: ecología y desarrollo sostenible. 6. ed. México: Prentice Hall, 1999.

ODUM, Eugène Pleasants. Fundamentos de Ecologia. Tradução de Antônio Manuel de Azevedo Gomes. 7. ed. Lisboa: Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian, 2004.

OTSUKA, Tadashi, Desirable Provisions regarding the Environment in the Constitution---A Perspective by an Environmental Law Researcher, Jurist, vol. 1325, 2006.

OTSUKA, Tadashi, Responsibility and Burden Sharing to Remediate the Environment---A Path to the Environmental Damage, Hogaku Kyoshitsu, vol. 329, 2008.

OTSUKA, Tadashi, Responsibility for the Environmental Damage, Jurist, vol.1372, 2009.-

OTSUKA, TADASHI, Environmental Law, 3 ed., Yuhikaku, 2010.

PIVA, Rui Carvalho. Bem Ambiental. São Paulo: Max Limonad, 2000.

SILVA, José Afonso da. Direito Ambiental Constitucional. 6. ed. São Paulo: Malheiros, 2007.

SILVEIRA, Clóvis Eduardo Malinverni da. O Princípio de Precaução como Critério de Avaliação de Processos Decisórios e Políticas Públicas Ambientais. Revista Internacional de Direito Ambiental. Caxias do Sul, n. 5, ano 2, p. 27-42, maio/ago. 2013.

SILVEIRA, PAULA DE CASTRO, Dano à Ecodiversidade e Responsabilidade Ambiental, Petrony Editora, 2019.

SUPREME COURT DECISION. Collection of Civil Precedents of the Supreme Court, of 30 March 2006; vol. 60, no. 3, p. 948: Kunitachi Landscape Case.

WATARI, Itaru, Right and Interest in Environmental Law---Focusing on the Environmental Right in NOBUTAKA TAKAHASHI et al. (ed.), Law and Theory of Environmental Conservation, Hokkaido University Publishing, 2014.

YOSHIDA, KATSUMI, Environmental Order and Public-Private Cooperation, Hokkaido University Publishing, 2011.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.18256/2238-0604.2019.v15i3.3810

Enlaces refback

  • No hay ningún enlace refback.


Bookmark and Share