Tutelas inibitórias contra licenças provisórias: um novo capítulo na batalha dos royalties de SEP

Autores

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18256/2238-0604.2026.v22i.5386

Palavras-chave:

Patentes essenciais a padrões (SEPs); FRAND; licenças provisórias; Tutela contra licenças provisórias; liminares antiprocesso; Tribunal Unificado de Patentes (UPC); territorialidade; Acordo TRIPS; solução de controvérsias da OMC; adjudicação global.

Resumo

O regime de tutela de licenças provisórias do Reino Unido e as subsequentes tutelas inibitórias contra licenças provisórias do Tribunal Unificado de Patentes introduziram uma nova dimensão nos litígios globais sobre patentes essenciais a padrões (SEPs). Este artigo examina o conflito emergente entre essas abordagens concorrentes e argumenta que ele reflete uma tensão estrutural mais ampla entre a natureza territorial dos direitos de patente e o caráter cada vez mais global da adjudicação de controvérsias FRAND. Após analisar o desenvolvimento do regime de licenças provisórias do Reino Unido e a resposta da UPC no caso InterDigital v. Amazon, o artigo situa esse confronto judicial no contexto mais amplo das disputas da OMC relacionadas a medidas antiprocesso, fixação global de tarifas FRAND e o princípio da territorialidade previsto no Acordo TRIPS. Conclui que a escalada processual atual é sintomática da ausência de um arcabouço internacional coerente para a atribuição de jurisdição sobre disputas globais envolvendo SEPs e que soluções duradouras exigirão maior coordenação entre tribunais nacionais, instituições internacionais e mecanismos de ordem particular.

Downloads

Os dados de download ainda não estão disponíveis.

Biografia do Autor

  • Pedro Henrique D. Batista, Affiliated Research Fellow, Max Planck Institute for Innovation and Competition, Munich.

    Dr. jur., LL.M. (Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität Munich). Senior Research Fellow, Leibniz Institute for Information Infrastructure (FIZ Karlsruhe). Affiliated Research Fellow, Max Planck Institute for Innovation and Competition, Munich.

Referências

Batista, P.H.D. and Mazutti, G., Comment on “Huawei Technologies” (C-170/13): Standard Essential Patents and Competition Law – How Far Does the CJEU Decision Go?, IIC 244 (2016).

Brazier, T., Three cases highlight key difficulties with the UK interim SEP licence regime, IAM (online), 25 July 2025. Available at: https://www.iam-media.com/hub/sepfrand-hub-archived/2024/article/three-cases-highlight-key-difficulties-the-uk-interim-sep-licence-regime.

Cohen, M., China’s ASI Strategic Retreat and WTO Compliance, China IPR (online), 3 April 2026. Available at: https://chinaipr.com/2026/04/03/chinas-asi-strategic-retreat-and-wto-compliance/.

Contreras, J.L., A Brief History of FRAND: Analyzing Current Debates in Standard Setting and Antitrust Through a Historical Lens, 80 Antitrust Law Journal 39 (2015). Available at: https://nsai.co.in/storage/app/media/A_BRIEF_HISTORY_OF_FRAND.pdf.

Contreras, J.L., It’s Anti-Suit Injunctions All the Way Down: The Strange New Realities of International Litigation over Standards-Essential Patents, 26(4) IP Litigator 1 (2020). Available at: https://dc.law.utah.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1230&context=scholarship

Contreras, J.L., Panasonic v. Xiaomi: The UK Interim License, in J.L. Contreras (ed), FRAND Cases in Context, Edward Elgar (2026), p. 398-408. Available at: https://www.elgaronline.com/edcollbook-oa/book/9781035336203/9781035336203.xml.

Contreras, J.L. and Newman, D., Developing a Framework for Arbitrating Standards-Essential Patent Disputes, 2014 Journal of Dispute Resolution 23 (2014). Available at: https://scholarship.law.missouri.edu/jdr/vol2014/iss1/4/.

Dean, M. and Lambert, J., Patents Court responds to UPC anti-interim-licence injunction in InterDigital v Amazon, Mishcon de Reya (online), 24 October 2025. Available at: https://www.mishcon.com/news/patents-court-responds-to-upc-anti-interim-licence-injunction-in-interdigital-v-amazon.

Epstein, R.A., Kieff, F.S. and Spulber, D.F., The FTC, IP, and SSOs: Government Hold-Up Replacing Private Coordination, 8 Journal of Competition Law and Economics 1 (2012). Available at: https://scholarship.law.gwu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1757&context=faculty_publications.

European Commission (DG Trade), Following WTO ruling favourable to the EU, China announces withdrawal of its anti-suit injunction policy, EC (online), 1 April 2026. Available at: https://policy.trade.ec.europa.eu/news/following-wto-ruling-favourable-eu-china-announces-withdrawal-its-anti-suit-injunction-policy-2026-04-01_en.

Farrell, J., Hayes, J., Shapiro, C. and Sullivan, T., Standard Setting, Patents, and Hold-Up, 74 Antitrust Law Journal 603 (2007). Available at: https://faculty.haas.berkeley.edu/Shapiro/standards2007.pdf

Foster S., UPC anti-interim licence injunction prompts English anti-anti suit response, Lewis Silkin (online), 30 October 2025. Available at: https://www.lewissilkin.com/insights/2025/10/30/upc-antiinterim-licence-injunction-prompts-english-antianti-suit-response-102lrle.

Gervais, D.J., The Principle of Territoriality in International Intellectual Property Law and Its Implications for Global FRAND Rate-Setting, GRUR International, vol. 75, no. 2, 105 (2026).

Hornby, J., Jackson M., Compton T. UPC grants landmark anti-interim-licence injunction, J A Kemp (online), 10 October 2025. Available at: https://www.jakemp.com/knowledge-hub/upc-grants-landmark-anti-interim-licence-injunction/.

Lambert J., Amazon v InterDigital: Is the UPC embracing the ‘madness’ of country-by-country SEP litigation?, Mishcon de Reya (online), 1 April 2026. Available at: https://www.mishcon.com/news/amazon-v-interdigital-is-the-upc-embracing-the-madness-of-country-by-country-sep-litigation.

Lauriat, B., Pay No Attention to the Comparable Behind the Curtain: The Harms of Opacity in Standard Essential Patent Licensing, 38 Berkeley Technology Law Journal (2023). Available at: https://btlj.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/0007-38-Haas-Lauriat.pdf.

Leistner, M., The First SEP/FRAND Decisions on the Merits of the UPC. An Overview in Context, SSRN Paper No. 5309340 (2025). Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=5309340.

Lemley, M.A. and Shapiro, C., Patent Holdup and Royalty Stacking, 85 Texas Law Review 1991 (2007). Available at: https://faculty.haas.berkeley.edu/shapiro/stacking.pdf

Mosteller, J. and Svetlov, A., What To Know About Interim Licenses In Global FRAND Cases, Law360, 28 October 2025. Available at: https://www.fr.com/insights/thought-leadership/articles/what-to-know-about-interim-licenses-in-global-frand-cases/.

Mueller, F., EU Commission may have to bring WTO complaint against UK: appeals court says Lenovo may get interim license from Ericsson, ip fray (online), 30 January 2025. Available at: https://ipfray.com/eu-commission-may-have-to-bring-wto-complaint-against-uk-appeals-court-says-lenovo-may-get-interim-license-from-ericsson-schedules-urgent-hearing-for-february-18/.

Mueller F., European Commission drops EU SEP Regulation in line with its promise to depart from overregulation: new proposal may or may not come, ip fray (online), 11 February 2025. Available at: https://ipfray.com/european-commission-drops-eu-sep-regulation-in-line-with-its-promise-to-depart-from-overregulation-new-proposal-may-or-may-not-come/.

Office of the United States Trade Representative, 2026 Special 301 Report, Washington DC (2026). Available at: https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/files/Press/Releases/2026/2026%20Special%20301%20Report.pdf.

Rafferty, O. S. CJEU publishes European Parliament’s suit against European Commission’s decision to withdraw SEP Regulation, ip fray (online), 5 January 2026. Available at: https://ipfray.com/cjeu-publishes-european-parliaments-suit-against-european-commissions-decision-to-withdraw-sep-regulation/.

Shapiro, C., Navigating the Patent Thicket: Cross Licenses, Patent Pools, and Standard Setting, in Jaffe, A., Lerner, J. and Stern, S. (eds), Innovation Policy and the Economy, vol. 1, MIT Press, 119 (2001). Available at: https://www.nber.org/system/files/chapters/c10778/c10778.pdf

UC Berkeley School of Law (BCLT), Global FRAND Rate Setting, Anti-Anti-Suit Injunctions, and the Licensing Negotiation Group Debate After Unwired Planet, BCLT Legal Analysis (2025). Available at: https://www.law.berkeley.edu/research/bclt/bclt-legal-analysis/apli-d1-p5/.

Unknown Author, ‘AAAAASI’ in Amazon v. InterDigital SEP dispute, Olarte Moura (online). 23 October 2025. Available at: https://olartemoure.com/en/amazon-v-interdigital-sep-dispute/.

Unknown Author, The InterDigital and Amazon SEP saga heats up with latest Unified Patent Court judgments, Osborne Clark (online), 29 January 2026. Available at: https://www.osborneclarke.com/insights/interdigital-and-amazon-sep-saga-heats-latest-unified-patent-court-judgments.

Unknown Author, UK government launches consultation on standard essential patents to support tech-driven growth, Osborne Clarke (online), 23 July 2025. Available at: https://www.osborneclarke.com/insights/uk-government-launches-consultation-standard-essential-patents-support-tech-driven-growth.

Downloads

Publicado

30-07-2026

Edição

Seção

SEP - FRAND

Como Citar

BATISTA, Pedro Henrique D. Tutelas inibitórias contra licenças provisórias: um novo capítulo na batalha dos royalties de SEP. Revista Brasileira de Direito, Passo Fundo, RS, Brasil, v. 22, 2026. DOI: 10.18256/2238-0604.2026.v22i.5386. Disponível em: https://seer.atitus.edu.br/index.php/revistadedireito/article/view/5386. Acesso em: 1 ago. 2026.