SEP/FRAND as Instruments of Technological Sovereignty: Rethinking Global IP Governance in an Era of Geoeconomic Fragmentation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18256/2238-0604.2026.v22i.5374Palavras-chave:
SEP/FRAND; Technological sovereignty; Intellectual property governance; Geoeconomic fragmentation; Technological governance.Resumo
The SEP/FRAND regime has become one of the most sophisticated structures of private coordination within the digital economy, designed to reconcile patent protection with the technological standardization necessary for market interoperability. The geoeconomic transformations of recent decades, however, have placed increasing pressure on this institutional architecture, shifting the debate beyond traditional concerns related to economic efficiency, competition, and the licensing of essential technologies. In strategic sectors such as telecommunications, artificial intelligence, the Internet of Things, and semiconductors, the ownership of standard-essential patents and the definition of access conditions to standardized technologies have come to influence broader dynamics of strategic autonomy, industrial competitiveness, and the distribution of power within the global economy. In this context, the SEP/FRAND system no longer operates exclusively as a mechanism of private innovation governance, but assumes a relevant role in structuring technological dependencies and shaping the critical infrastructures of the digital economy. Based on bibliographical, documentary, and jurisprudential research, this article argues that the politicization of technological governance requires a reinterpretation of the SEP/FRAND regime as an instrument of technological sovereignty, revealing a reconfiguration of global intellectual property governance in a context marked by geoeconomic fragmentation.
Downloads
Referências
BLIND, Knut. Standardization and standards: safeguards of technological sovereignty? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, v. 210, p. 123873, 2025. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123873. Accessed on: June 21, 2026.
BRACHTENDORF, Lorenz; GAESSLER, Fabian; HARHOFF, Dietmar. Truly standard-essential patents? A semantics-based analysis. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, v. 32, n. 1, p. 132–157, 2023. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/jems.12500. Accessed on: June 21, 2026.
CONTRERAS, Jorge L. A Brief History of FRAND: Analyzing Current Debates in Standard Setting and Antitrust Through a Historical Lens. Antitrust Law Journal, v. 80, n. 1, p. 39–120, 2015. Available at: https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2374983. Accessed on: June 22, 2026.
DUARTE, Filipa Belo Morgado. O abuso de posição dominante no licenciamento de patentes essenciais a normas. 2025. Dissertação (Mestrado em Direito Empresarial) – Faculdade de Direito, Escola de Lisboa, Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Lisboa, 2025. Available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10400.14/54097. Accessed on: June 18, 2026.
EDLER, Jakob et al. Technology sovereignty as an emerging frame for innovation policy: defining rationales, ends and means. Research Policy, v. 52, n. 6, p. 104765, 2023a. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2023.104765. Accessed on: June 21, 2026.
EDLER, Jakob et al. Technology sovereignty as an emerging frame for innovation policy. Defining rationales, ends and means. Research Policy, v. 52, n. 6, p. 104765, 2023b. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2023.104765. Accessed on: June 21, 2026.
EDLER, Jakob et al. Technology sovereignty as an emerging frame for innovation policy. Defining rationales, ends and means. Research Policy, v. 52, n. 6, p. 104765, 2023c. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2023.104765. Accessed on: June 21, 2026.
EDITORIAL OFFICE. Jurisdiction of UK Courts on FRAND Disputes Regarding Global Licences of Multinational Patent Portfolios. GRUR International, v. 70, n. 2, p. 174–184, 2021. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/grurint/ikaa188. Accessed on: June 21, 2026.
ERIXON, Fredrik; BAUER, Matthias. Standard Essential Patents and the Quest for Faster Diffusion of Technology. ECIPE Policy Brief, n. 2, 2017. Available at: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/174809. Accessed on: June 18, 2026.
LAWRANCE, Sophie; BROOKS, Francion; BATSFORD, James. Unwired Planet v Huawei, Conversant v Huawei & ZTE: UK Supreme Court confirms global FRAND licensing. Journal of European Competition Law & Practice, v. 11, n. 9, p. 516–523, 2020. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/jeclap/lpaa083. Accessed on: June 21, 2026.
MÉNIÈRE, Yann. Fair, Reasonable and Non-Discriminatory (FRAND) Licensing Terms: Research Analysis of a Controversial Concept. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2015. Available at: https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC96258. Accessed on: June 18, 2026.
OPANY, Fidelice. The Search for an Optimal Framework for Licensing Standard-Essential Patents: Is Collective Licensing a Solution? International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, v. 56, n. 4, p. 713–736, 2025. Available at: https://tind.wipo.int/record/59481. Accessed on: June 21, 2026.
PATRA, Soumya Prakash; RAJU, K. D. Standardization and Standard Essential Patents for Public Good: Application in Automotive Industry. SASI, v. 27, n. 1, p. 53–60, 2021. Available at: https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/sasi/article/view/402. Accessed on: June 21, 2026.
PICHT, Peter. Unwired Planet v Huawei: A Seminal SEP/FRAND Decision from the UK. Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpx152. Accessed on: 16 June, 2026.
PICHT, Peter Georg; LODERER, Gaspare Tazio. Arbitration in SEP/FRAND Disputes: Overview and Core Issues. Journal of International Arbitration, v. 36, n. 5, p. 575–594, 2019. Available at: https://doi.org/10.54648/JOIA2019029. Accessed on: 22 June 2026.
POLIDO, Fabrício Bertini Pasquot. Estado, soberania digital e tecnologias emergentes. Revista de Ciências do Estado, v. 9, n. 1, p. 1–30, 2024. Available at: https://doi.org/10.35699/2525-8036.2024.53066. Accessed on: June 21, 2026.
SILVA, Anny Caroline Gomes da. Patentes essenciais a um padrão tecnológico: um estudo inicial da judicialização dos conflitos como mecanismo de proteção no Brasil. 2023. 60 f. Trabalho de Conclusão de Curso (Bacharelado em Direito) – Faculdade Nacional de Direito, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, 2023. Available at: http://hdl.handle.net/11422/22861. Accessed on: June 18, 2026.
SILVA, Bruna Sampaio; FELTRIN, Carolina Ramos. Propriedade intelectual e soberania nacional: análise do acordo de salvaguardas tecnológicas entre Brasil e Estados Unidos para o Centro Espacial de Alcântara. ÎANDÉ: Ciências e Humanidades, v. 4, n. 1, p. 22–33, 2020. Available at: https://doi.org/10.36942/iande.v4i1.232. Accessed on: June 21, 2026.
SPULBER, Daniel F. Standard Setting Organisations and Standard Essential Patents: Voting and Markets. The Economic Journal, v. 129, n. 619, p. 1477–1509, 2019. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/ecoj.12606. Accessed on: June 21, 2026.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON. Microsoft Corporation v. Motorola, Inc., et al. Case nº C10-1823JLR. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law. Seattle, WA, Apr. 25, 2013. Accessed on: June 16, 2026.
VAN DER POL, Johannes. Technological Sovereignty and the Strategic Use of SEPs: Exploring the Broadness of Multi-Standard Patents. 2024. Available at: https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5039413. Accessed on: June 21, 2026.
VON LAER, Maximilian; BLIND, Knut; RAMEL, Florian. Standard essential patents and global ICT value chains with a focus on the catching-up of China. Telecommunications Policy, v. 46, n. 2, p. 102110, 2022. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2021.102110. Accessed on: June 21, 2026.
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2026 Suelen Carls, José Luís Mazuquelli Junior
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Declaro ser inédito o presente artigo, bem como não estar o mesmo sujeito a qualquer outro processo de submissão para outra revista científica.
Declaro que autorizo a publicação do artigo pela revista na rede mundial de computadores e do conhecimento sobre a não remuneração em virtude de sua publicação, não cabendo nenhum direito autoral de cunho patrimonial.
Ainda, na condição de autor, assumo a responsabilidade civil e penalmente pelo conteúdo do trabalho publicado, após ter lido as diretrizes para autores e ter concordado com elas.
O trabalho pode ser acessado por qualquer interessado e reproduzido e/ou publicado desde que seja realizada a devida referência de acordo com a ABNT com a finalidade de divulgação da produção acadêmico científico.
