Confiscation as one of the methods ro protect intellectual property rights

Svitlychnyy Olexander, Myronenko Nataliia, Voroshylova Inna, Sergii Sergii Yurko, Svetlana Myrza

Abstract


It is well-known fact that products and goods produced with the usage of the object of intellectual property rights has additional demand, bring additional profits to their right holders, and as a result such goods often become the object of offenses. It has been indicated that, taking into account the unsatisfactory situation of intellectual property protection and the problems of the state system of intellectual property, Ukraine, like the entire civilized world, pays attention to ensuring private and public interests in the field of intellectual property. The authors of the article have analyzed the situation of legal protection and have paid attention to the measures taken by Ukraine to reform the state system of intellectual property. It has been established that social relations in the researched area concern criminal and administrative legal mechanisms related to seizing. It has been emphasized that different types of fines, criminal or administrative confiscation are applied to the violator depending on the violation of the legal norm. The authors have analyzed national and foreign regulatory legal acts, where attention is focused on one of the types of penalty – confiscation. The shortcomings of the Ukrainian legislation have been pointed out and amendments to it have been offered for the purpose of its improvement.


Keywords


Protection; liability for infringement of intellectual property rights; trademark; legal prohibition; systematization of legislation; quality of legislation; improvement of legislation

Full Text:

PDF

References


ANDROSHCHUK, Hennadii. USTR publishes the annual Special Report 301 on the protection of intellectual property. Legal newspaper, 26 May 2021. Available at: https://yur-gazeta.com/golovna/ustr-publikue-richniy-specialniy-zvit-301-pro-zahist-intelektualnoyi-vlasnosti.html. Access on: Sept. 2, 2002.

BAKONINA, Olena. The Constitutional Court confirmed the constitutionality of provisions on special confiscation. Jurliga. June 30, 2022. Available at: https://jurliga.ligazakon.net/news/212232_konstitutsyniy-sud-pdtverdiv-konstitutsynst-polozhen-pro-spetsalnu-konfskatsyu. Access on: Sept. 2, 2002.

BARANOV, Alexander et al. Mechanism of state economic security management in the direction of intellectual property rights protection: Сases of selected industries. Journal of Security and Sustainability Issues, v. 10. no. 1, p. 19-34, 2020.

BARKHATOVA, Natalia. The Archpole design bureau accused Sheremetyevo of plagiarizing furniture. RB.RU. January 2020. Available at: https://rb.ru/news/archpole-sheremetevo/. Access on: Sept. 2, 2002.

BELGIUM. Council of State. House if Representatives. Criminal Code of Belgium of August 21, 2021. Available at: https://legislationline.org/sites/default/files/documents/6e/BELG_CC_fr.pdf. Access on: Sept. 2, 2002.

BILOUSOVA, Nina et al. Intellectual property and patent science. Kyiv: KPI named after Igor Sikorskyi, Polytechnic Publishing House, 2021.

COUNCIL OF EUROPE. Convention on Laundering, Search, Seizure and Confiscation of the Proceeds from Crime and on the Financing of Terrorism of May 16, 2005. Available at: https://zakon. rada.gov.ua/ laws/show/994_948?find=1&text# =конфіскація#Text. Access on: Sept. 2, 2002.

GUSAROV, Serhii. Certain aspects of state service reform. Journal of the National Academy of Legal Sciences of Ukraine, v. 28. no. 1, p. 14-25, 2020.

IVASHOVA, Liudmyla; ANTONOVA, Liudmyla; IVASHOV, Mykhailo. The institutional mechanism for the protection of intellectual property rights in the context of Ukraine’s integration into the EU. Public administration and customs administration, v. 4. no. 35, p. 39-49, 2022.

KOROTUN, Olena. Administrative and legal protection of intellectual property in Ukraine. 2020. Dissertation (D.Sc. in Law). Kyiv.

KULCHYTSKYI, Nazar; SLIUSAR, Andrii. Well, a very special confiscation. Legal Gazette. July 2, 2020. Available at: https://vkp.ua/publication/nu-duzhe-spetsialna-konfiskatsiya. Access on: Sept. 2, 2002.

LEBEDIEVA, Ganna. Protection of the rights and interests of individuals violated as a result of the use of objects of intellectual property law. 2021. Dissertation (D.Sc.). Odesa.

LISOVYI, Artem. Prevention of copyright violations on the Internet. 2021. Dissertation (PhD in Law). Kyiv.

MERNYK, Anastasiia. Control of observance of human rights during their restrictions in the conditions of special legal regimes. Journal of the National Academy of Legal Sciences of Ukraine, v. 30. no. 1, pp. 31-43, 2023.

ORTYNSKA, Mariia. The way to protect intellectual property within criminal proceedings and factors that can prevent this. Law and Business, v. 25-26, pp. 1375-1376, 2018. Available at: https://zib.com.ua/ru/print/133501-kak_zaschitit_intellektualnuyu_sobstvennost_v_ugolovnom_proc.html. Access on: Sept. 2, 2002.

PETRYSHYN, Oleksandr; PETRYSHYN, Oleh; HYLIAKA, Oleh. The problem of non-implementation of judgements of the European Court of Human Rights in Ukraine in the context of the rule of law (methodological and comparanive aspects). Journal of the National Academy of Legal Sciences of Ukraine, v. 28. no. 2, pp. 17-24, 2021.

RABINOVYCH, Petro; DUDASH, Tamara. Legal argumentation: Some general theoretical aspects. Journal of the National Academy of Legal Sciences of Ukraine, v. 29. no. 1, pp. 13-25, 2022.

SHMORGUN, Vyacheslav. Administrative and legal protection of means of individualization of participants in economic turnover, goods and services. 2020. Dissertation (PhD in Law). Kyiv.

SOLOVE, Daniel J. The Myth of the Privacy Paradox. The George Washington law review. Washington, v. 89. no. 1, p. 51, 2021.

TEREMETSKYI, Vladyslav et al. Features of legal protection of medical inventions: present and future. Pathologia, v. 16, n. 3(47), p. 417-423, 2019. https://doi.org/10.14739/2310-1237.2019.3.188972

TEREMETSKYI, Vladyslav; AVRAMOVA Olga; ANDRIIV Vasyl. Risks of Deprivation of the Ownership Right by the Examples of The Nationalization and Re-Privatization. Journal of Law and Political Sciences, v. 23, n. 2/C, p. 83-103, 2020. Available at: https://drive.google.com/file/d/15r3HAXqJ7Mow4-jaoLcBKZo8hEeL_xJY/view/. Access on: Sept. 2, 2002.

UKRAINE. The Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine. Order No. 943 «Some issues of the National Intellectual Property Authority» of October 28, 2022). Available at: https://zakononline.com.ua/ documents/ show/511765708995. Access on: Sept. 2, 2002.

UKRAINE. The Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine. Resolution No. 179 «National economic strategy for the period until 2030» of March 10, 2021. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/179-2021-р. Access on: Sept. 2, 2002.

UKRAINE. The Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court. Decision in case No. 400/548/19 of April 18, 2020). Available at: https://zakononline.com.ua/court-decisions/show/88952401. Access on: Sept. 2, 2002.

UKRAINE. The Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. Code of Ukraine on Administrative Offenses of December 7, 1984. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/80731-10#Text. Access on: Sept. 2, 2002.

UKRAINE. The Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. Constitution of Ukraine of June 28, 1996. Available at: https://www.president.gov.ua/documents/constitution. Access on: Sept. 2, 2002.

UKRAINE. The Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. Criminal Code of Ukraine of April 5, 2001. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2341-14#Text. Access on: Sept. 2, 2002.

UKRAINE. The Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. Customs Code of Ukraine of March 13, 2012. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/4495-17#Text. Access on: Sept. 2, 2002.

UKRAINE. The Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. Law of Ukraine No. 2974 «On amendments to some legislative acts of Ukraine regarding strengthening the protection of intellectual property rights» of March 20, 2023. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2974-20#Text. Access on: Sept. 2, 2002.

UKRAINE. The Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. Law of Ukraine No. 981-VIII «On the adoption of the Protocol on Amendments to the TRIPS Agreement» of February 3, 2016. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/981-19#Text. Access on: Sept. 2, 2002.

UKRAINE. The Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. Law of Ukraine No. 703-IX «On amendments to some laws of Ukraine regarding the creation of a national intellectual property body» of January 1, 2023. Available at: https:// zakon.rada.gov.ua/ laws/show/703-20#Text. Access on: Sept. 2, 2002.

WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION. Agreement on trade aspects of intellectual property rights of April 15, 1994. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/981_018#Text. Access on: Sept. 2, 2002.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.18256/2238-0604.2023.v19i1.4916

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




ISSN 2238-0604

Licença Creative Commons

This Revista Brasileira de Direito is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Indexers

Periódicos CAPES  googlelogo_scholar.png
DOAJ.jpg
 
Diadorim.jpg
 dialnet.png
latindex.jpg
 
 logos_DOI_CrossRef_CrossChek.png

 
circ.png
 miar.png

logo_base.gif
 
 logos_DOI_CrossRef_CrossChek.png
CiteFactor2.png
 
Scilit logo