Confiscação como um dos métodos para proteger os direitos de propriedade intelectual

Autores

  • Svitlychnyy Olexander Doctor in Law, Professor, professor of the Department of Civil and Commercial Law National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine, 15, Heroiv Oborony st., Kyiv, 03041, Ukraine http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1783-6029
  • Myronenko Nataliia https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5463-6336
  • Voroshylova Inna PhD in Law, Senior Research Fellow, Associate Professor at the Department of International Law, European and Euro-Atlantic Integration, Faculty of Law and International Relations, Borys Grinchenko Kyiv University, 13-B, Tymoshenka st, Kyiv, 04207, Ukraine. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3271-6719. E-mail: [email protected]. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3271-6719
  • Sergii Sergii Yurko Ph.D. in Law, Associate Professor, Cherkasy State Technological University, Ukraine, Advocate of the National Bar Association of Ukraine, 460, Shevchenko st., Chercassy, 18000, Ukraine. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5960-6096. E-mail: [email protected]. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5960-6096
  • Svetlana Myrza PhD in Law, Associate professor, associate Professor of the Department of Civil Law Disciplines, Odessa State University of Internal Affairs, 1, Uspenska st., Odesa, 65000, Ukraine. ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4155-7513. E-mail: [email protected]. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4155-7513

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18256/2238-0604.2023.v19i1.4916

Palavras-chave:

Proteção, responsabilidade por violação de direitos de propriedade intelectual, marca, proibição legal, sistematização da legislação, qualidade da legislação, aperfeiçoamento da legislação

Resumo

É sabido que produtos e bens produzidos com a utilização do objeto de direitos de propriedade intelectual têm demanda adicional, trazem lucros adicionais aos seus titulares de direitos e, como resultado, tais bens muitas vezes tornam-se objeto de infrações. Foi indicado que, tendo em conta a situação insatisfatória da protecção da propriedade intelectual e os problemas do sistema estatal de propriedade intelectual, a Ucrânia, como todo o mundo civilizado, está atenta à garantia dos interesses públicos e privados no domínio da propriedade intelectual. Os autores do artigo analisaram a situação da protecção jurídica e prestaram atenção às medidas tomadas pela Ucrânia para reformar o sistema estatal de propriedade intelectual. Foi estabelecido que as relações sociais na área pesquisada dizem respeito aos mecanismos jurídicos criminais e administrativos relacionados à apreensão. Enfatizou-se que diferentes tipos de multas, confiscos criminais ou administrativos são aplicados ao infrator dependendo da violação da norma legal. Os autores analisaram atos jurídicos regulamentares nacionais e estrangeiros, onde a atenção se centra num dos tipos de pena – o confisco. Foram apontadas as deficiências da legislação ucraniana e propostas alterações à mesma com o objectivo de a melhorar.

Downloads

Os dados de download ainda não estão disponíveis.

Biografia do Autor

  • Svitlychnyy Olexander, Doctor in Law, Professor, professor of the Department of Civil and Commercial Law National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine, 15, Heroiv Oborony st., Kyiv, 03041, Ukraine
    Doctor in Law, Professor, professor of the Department of Civil and Commercial Law National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine, 15, Heroiv Oborony st., Kyiv, 03041, Ukraine.
  • Myronenko Nataliia

    Doctor in Law, Professor, Deputy Director for Research Scientific-Research Institute of Intellectual Property National Academy of Law Sciences of Ukraine, 11, Каzymyra Маlevycha st., Kyiv, 03150, Ukraine. ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5463-6336. E-mail: [email protected].

  • Voroshylova Inna, PhD in Law, Senior Research Fellow, Associate Professor at the Department of International Law, European and Euro-Atlantic Integration, Faculty of Law and International Relations, Borys Grinchenko Kyiv University, 13-B, Tymoshenka st, Kyiv, 04207, Ukraine. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3271-6719. E-mail: [email protected].

    PhD in Law, Senior Research Fellow, Associate Professor at the Department of International Law, European and Euro-Atlantic Integration, Faculty of Law and International Relations, Borys Grinchenko Kyiv University, 13-B, Tymoshenka st, Kyiv, 04207, Ukraine. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3271-6719. E-mail: [email protected]

  • Sergii Sergii Yurko, Ph.D. in Law, Associate Professor, Cherkasy State Technological University, Ukraine, Advocate of the National Bar Association of Ukraine, 460, Shevchenko st., Chercassy, 18000, Ukraine. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5960-6096. E-mail: [email protected].

    Ph.D. in Law, Associate Professor, Cherkasy State Technological University, Ukraine, Advocate of the National Bar Association of Ukraine, 460, Shevchenko st., Chercassy, 18000, Ukraine. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5960-6096. E-mail: [email protected]

  • Svetlana Myrza, PhD in Law, Associate professor, associate Professor of the Department of Civil Law Disciplines, Odessa State University of Internal Affairs, 1, Uspenska st., Odesa, 65000, Ukraine. ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4155-7513. E-mail: [email protected].

    PhD in Law, Associate professor, associate Professor of the Department of Civil Law Disciplines, Odessa State University of Internal Affairs, 1, Uspenska st., Odesa, 65000, Ukraine. ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4155-7513. E-mail: [email protected].

Referências

ANDROSHCHUK, Hennadii. USTR publishes the annual Special Report 301 on the protection of intellectual property. Legal newspaper, 26 May 2021. Available at: https://yur-gazeta.com/golovna/ustr-publikue-richniy-specialniy-zvit-301-pro-zahist-intelektualnoyi-vlasnosti.html. Access on: Sept. 2, 2002.

BAKONINA, Olena. The Constitutional Court confirmed the constitutionality of provisions on special confiscation. Jurliga. June 30, 2022. Available at: https://jurliga.ligazakon.net/news/212232_konstitutsyniy-sud-pdtverdiv-konstitutsynst-polozhen-pro-spetsalnu-konfskatsyu. Access on: Sept. 2, 2002.

BARANOV, Alexander et al. Mechanism of state economic security management in the direction of intellectual property rights protection: Сases of selected industries. Journal of Security and Sustainability Issues, v. 10. no. 1, p. 19-34, 2020.

BARKHATOVA, Natalia. The Archpole design bureau accused Sheremetyevo of plagiarizing furniture. RB.RU. January 2020. Available at: https://rb.ru/news/archpole-sheremetevo/. Access on: Sept. 2, 2002.

BELGIUM. Council of State. House if Representatives. Criminal Code of Belgium of August 21, 2021. Available at: https://legislationline.org/sites/default/files/documents/6e/BELG_CC_fr.pdf. Access on: Sept. 2, 2002.

BILOUSOVA, Nina et al. Intellectual property and patent science. Kyiv: KPI named after Igor Sikorskyi, Polytechnic Publishing House, 2021.

COUNCIL OF EUROPE. Convention on Laundering, Search, Seizure and Confiscation of the Proceeds from Crime and on the Financing of Terrorism of May 16, 2005. Available at: https://zakon. rada.gov.ua/ laws/show/994_948?find=1&text# =конфіскація#Text. Access on: Sept. 2, 2002.

GUSAROV, Serhii. Certain aspects of state service reform. Journal of the National Academy of Legal Sciences of Ukraine, v. 28. no. 1, p. 14-25, 2020.

IVASHOVA, Liudmyla; ANTONOVA, Liudmyla; IVASHOV, Mykhailo. The institutional mechanism for the protection of intellectual property rights in the context of Ukraine’s integration into the EU. Public administration and customs administration, v. 4. no. 35, p. 39-49, 2022.

KOROTUN, Olena. Administrative and legal protection of intellectual property in Ukraine. 2020. Dissertation (D.Sc. in Law). Kyiv.

KULCHYTSKYI, Nazar; SLIUSAR, Andrii. Well, a very special confiscation. Legal Gazette. July 2, 2020. Available at: https://vkp.ua/publication/nu-duzhe-spetsialna-konfiskatsiya. Access on: Sept. 2, 2002.

LEBEDIEVA, Ganna. Protection of the rights and interests of individuals violated as a result of the use of objects of intellectual property law. 2021. Dissertation (D.Sc.). Odesa.

LISOVYI, Artem. Prevention of copyright violations on the Internet. 2021. Dissertation (PhD in Law). Kyiv.

MERNYK, Anastasiia. Control of observance of human rights during their restrictions in the conditions of special legal regimes. Journal of the National Academy of Legal Sciences of Ukraine, v. 30. no. 1, pp. 31-43, 2023.

ORTYNSKA, Mariia. The way to protect intellectual property within criminal proceedings and factors that can prevent this. Law and Business, v. 25-26, pp. 1375-1376, 2018. Available at: https://zib.com.ua/ru/print/133501-kak_zaschitit_intellektualnuyu_sobstvennost_v_ugolovnom_proc.html. Access on: Sept. 2, 2002.

PETRYSHYN, Oleksandr; PETRYSHYN, Oleh; HYLIAKA, Oleh. The problem of non-implementation of judgements of the European Court of Human Rights in Ukraine in the context of the rule of law (methodological and comparanive aspects). Journal of the National Academy of Legal Sciences of Ukraine, v. 28. no. 2, pp. 17-24, 2021.

RABINOVYCH, Petro; DUDASH, Tamara. Legal argumentation: Some general theoretical aspects. Journal of the National Academy of Legal Sciences of Ukraine, v. 29. no. 1, pp. 13-25, 2022.

SHMORGUN, Vyacheslav. Administrative and legal protection of means of individualization of participants in economic turnover, goods and services. 2020. Dissertation (PhD in Law). Kyiv.

SOLOVE, Daniel J. The Myth of the Privacy Paradox. The George Washington law review. Washington, v. 89. no. 1, p. 51, 2021.

TEREMETSKYI, Vladyslav et al. Features of legal protection of medical inventions: present and future. Pathologia, v. 16, n. 3(47), p. 417-423, 2019. https://doi.org/10.14739/2310-1237.2019.3.188972

TEREMETSKYI, Vladyslav; AVRAMOVA Olga; ANDRIIV Vasyl. Risks of Deprivation of the Ownership Right by the Examples of The Nationalization and Re-Privatization. Journal of Law and Political Sciences, v. 23, n. 2/C, p. 83-103, 2020. Available at: https://drive.google.com/file/d/15r3HAXqJ7Mow4-jaoLcBKZo8hEeL_xJY/view/. Access on: Sept. 2, 2002.

UKRAINE. The Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine. Order No. 943 «Some issues of the National Intellectual Property Authority» of October 28, 2022). Available at: https://zakononline.com.ua/ documents/ show/511765708995. Access on: Sept. 2, 2002.

UKRAINE. The Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine. Resolution No. 179 «National economic strategy for the period until 2030» of March 10, 2021. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/179-2021-р. Access on: Sept. 2, 2002.

UKRAINE. The Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court. Decision in case No. 400/548/19 of April 18, 2020). Available at: https://zakononline.com.ua/court-decisions/show/88952401. Access on: Sept. 2, 2002.

UKRAINE. The Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. Code of Ukraine on Administrative Offenses of December 7, 1984. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/80731-10#Text. Access on: Sept. 2, 2002.

UKRAINE. The Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. Constitution of Ukraine of June 28, 1996. Available at: https://www.president.gov.ua/documents/constitution. Access on: Sept. 2, 2002.

UKRAINE. The Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. Criminal Code of Ukraine of April 5, 2001. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2341-14#Text. Access on: Sept. 2, 2002.

UKRAINE. The Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. Customs Code of Ukraine of March 13, 2012. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/4495-17#Text. Access on: Sept. 2, 2002.

UKRAINE. The Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. Law of Ukraine No. 2974 «On amendments to some legislative acts of Ukraine regarding strengthening the protection of intellectual property rights» of March 20, 2023. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2974-20#Text. Access on: Sept. 2, 2002.

UKRAINE. The Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. Law of Ukraine No. 981-VIII «On the adoption of the Protocol on Amendments to the TRIPS Agreement» of February 3, 2016. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/981-19#Text. Access on: Sept. 2, 2002.

UKRAINE. The Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. Law of Ukraine No. 703-IX «On amendments to some laws of Ukraine regarding the creation of a national intellectual property body» of January 1, 2023. Available at: https:// zakon.rada.gov.ua/ laws/show/703-20#Text. Access on: Sept. 2, 2002.

WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION. Agreement on trade aspects of intellectual property rights of April 15, 1994. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/981_018#Text. Access on: Sept. 2, 2002.

Downloads

Publicado

31-12-2023

Edição

Seção

Contribuição exclusiva de autor estrangeiro

Como Citar

OLEXANDER, Svitlychnyy; NATALIIA, Myronenko; INNA, Voroshylova; SERGII YURKO, Sergii; MYRZA, Svetlana. Confiscação como um dos métodos para proteger os direitos de propriedade intelectual. Revista Brasileira de Direito, Passo Fundo, RS, Brasil, v. 19, n. 1, p. e4916, 2023. DOI: 10.18256/2238-0604.2023.v19i1.4916. Disponível em: https://seer.atitus.edu.br/index.php/revistadedireito/article/view/4916. Acesso em: 31 ago. 2025.