Globalization, comparative constitutional law and contemporary liberal constitutionalism: visions on the impacts of the mundialization of social and economic relations in constitutionalism

Flávio Pansieri, Ilton Norberto Robl Filho

Abstract


Globalization is originally an economic phenomenon with strong social and legal impacts. Important social and legal literature with emphasis on Brazilian constitutional and public law points to the neoliberal character of globalization, violating the Social Rule of Law, fundamental social rights and material equality, and against national sovereignty. This article agrees with the negative impacts of globalization, but points out that this view is partially insufficient in the field of constitutional law for two main reasons: a) disregards the impact of globalization on the field of comparative constitutional law and b) criticizes liberalism in an exacerbated manner, which is a central element of contemporary constitutionalism. Thus, the work reflects on comparative constitutional law and its construction from globalization, developing the theme of criticism of contemporary and liberal constitutionalism.


Keywords


Globalization; Comparative Constitutional Law; Liberalism; Constitutionalism

References


ACKERMAN, Bruce. The Future of Liberal Revolution. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1992.

BARBERA, Augusto. Le Basi Filosofiche del Costituzionalismo. In: BARBERA, Augusto. Le Basi Filosofiche del Costituzionalismo. 12ª ed. Bari: Editori Laterza, 2012, p. 3-42.

BONAVIDES, Paulo. Do País Constitucional ao País Neocolonial: a Derrubada da Constituição e a Recolonização pelo Golpe de Estado Institucional. 2ª ed. São Paulo: Malheiros, 1999.

DANTAS, Ivo. Teoria do Estado Contemporâneo. 2ª ed. São Paulo: Revista dos Tribunais, 2013.

DAHL, Robert A. A Democracia e seus Críticos. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2012.

GINSBURG, Tom; HUG, Aziz; VERSTEEG, Mila. The Coming Demise of Liberal Constitutionalism? The University of Chicago Law Review. Volume 85, Number 2, p. 239-255, March 2018.

HIRSCHL, Ran. Comparative Matters: The Renaissance of Comparative Constitutional Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.

JACKSON, Vicki C.; TUSHNET, Mark. Comparative Constitutional Law. 3ª ed. St. Paul: Foundation Press, 2014.

LANDAU, David. Abusive Constitutionalism. University of California, Davis Law Review, v. 47, n. 189, p. 189-260, April 2013.

MARCELLINO JUNIOR, Julio Cesar. Princípio Constitucional da Eficiência Administrativa: (Des)encontros entre Economia e Direito. Florianópolis: Habitus, 2009.

NEVES, Marcelo da Costa Pinto. Transconstitucionalismo. Tese Apresentada ao Concurso de Professor Titular na Universidade de São Paulo. 2009.

NUNES, António José Avelãs. Neoliberalismo e Direito Humanos. Rio de Janeiro: Renovar, 2003.

NUNES, António José Avelãs. Uma Introdução à Economia Política. São Paulo: Quartier Latin, 2007.

O’DONNELL, Guilhermo. Accountability Horizontal e Novas Poliarquias. Lua Nova: Revista de Cultura e Política, n. 44, São Paulo, p. 27-54, 1998.

O’DONNELL, Guilhermo. Democracia Delegativa. Journal of Democracy en Español. Instituto de Ciencia Política, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, v. 1, p. 7-23, jul. 2009

SANTOS, Milton. Por uma outra Globalização: do Pensamento Único à Consciência Universal. São Paulo: Record, 2000.

SCHEPPELE, Kim Lane. Worst Practices and the Transnational Legal Order (Or How to Build a Constitutional “Democratorship” in Plain Sight). Background paper: Wright Lecture, University of Toronto, Nov. 2, 2016, p. 1-41.

STENNER, Karen; HAIDT, Jonathan. Authoritarianism is Not a Momentary Madness, but an Eternal Dynamic within Liberal Democracies. In SUNSTEIN, Cass. Can it happen here? Authoritarianism in America. New York: Harper Collins Publishers, 2018, p.175-220.

SUNSTEIN, Cass R. Democracy and the Problem of Free Speech. New York: The Free Press, 1995.

TUSCHNET, Mark. Advanced Introduction to Comparative Constitutional Law. 2ª ed. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2018.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.18256/2238-0604.2019.v15i3.3567

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




ISSN 2238-0604

Licença Creative Commons

This Revista Brasileira de Direito is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Indexers

Periódicos CAPES  googlelogo_scholar.png
DOAJ.jpg
 
Diadorim.jpg
 dialnet.png
latindex.jpg
 
 logos_DOI_CrossRef_CrossChek.png

 
circ.png
 miar.png

logo_base.gif
 
 logos_DOI_CrossRef_CrossChek.png
CiteFactor2.png
 
Scilit logo