The content of freedom of expression, hate speech and the democratic answer
Abstract
Keywords
References
BRIMACOMBE, Peter. All the Queen’s Men: The World of Elizabeth I. Palgrave Macmillan. Gloucestershire, United Kingdom: Sutton Publishing Ltd., 2000.
BUERGENTHAL, Thomas; NORRIS, Robert E. Human Rights, The Inter-american System, Part II, Chapter I, Oceana Publications, Inc.: Dobbs Ferry, New York, 1982.
CORTE INTERAMERICANA DE DIREITOS HUMANOS – CorteIDH. Opinião Consultiva 05/85, 1985. Disponível em: < http://www.corteidh.or.cr/docs/opiniones/seriea_05_esp.pdf >. Acesso em: 20 fev. 2016.
CORTE INTERAMERICANA DE DIREITOS HUMANOS – CorteIDH. Ricardo Canese vs. Paraguay, 2004. Disponível em: < http://www.corteidh.or.cr/docs/casos/articulos/seriec_111_esp.pdf >. Acesso em: 07 jan. 2016.
CRAM, Ian. Contested words, local restrictions on freedom of speech in liberal democracies. Ashgate: England, 2006.
EIJNATTEN, Joris van. In praise of moderate Enlightenment: a taxonomy of early modern arguments in favor of freedom of expression. In: POWERS, Elizabeth. Freedom of speech: the history of an idea. Bucknell University Press: United Kingdom, 2011.
DECLARAÇÃO INGLESA DE DIREITOS DE 1689. Universidade de São Paulo. Disponível em: < http://www.direitoshumanos.usp.br/index.php/Documentos-anteriores-à-criação-da-Sociedade-das-Nações-até-1919/a-declaracao-inglesa-de-direitos-1689.html >. Acesso em: 20 mar. 2016.
FARRIOR, Stephanie. Holding the Matrix: The Historical and Theoretical Foundations of International Law Concerning Hate Speech. Berkeley Journal of International Law, 14:1, 1996.
GREENE, Jamal. Hate Speech and the demos. The content and context of hate speech. In: HERZ, Michael, MOLNAR, Peter (org). Cambridge University Press: New York, 2012. p. 92-115.
ISRAEL, Jonathan I., Libertas Philosophandi in the Eighteenth Century: Radical Enlightenment versus Moderate Enlightenment. In: Freedom of Speech: The history of an idea. POWERS, Elizabeth (org.), Bucknell University Press: Estados Unidos, 2011.
MALIK, Kenan. Interview with Kenan Malik, The content and context of hate speech. HERZ, Michael, MOLNAR, Peter (Org.), Cambridge University Press: New York, 2012. p. 81-91.
MOLNAR, Peter. Responding to “Hate Speech” with Art, Education and the Imminent Danger Test. The content and context of hate speech. HERZ, Michael, MOLNAR, Peter (org). Cambridge University Press: New York, 2012. p. 183-197.
ONU – ORGANIZAÇÃO DAS NAÇÕES UNIDAS. Convenção Internacional para Eliminação de Todas as Formas de Discriminação. Disponível em < http://www.pge.sp.gov.br/centrodeestudos/bibliotecavirtual/instrumentos/discriraci.htm >. Acesso em: 17 fev. 2016.
ONU – ORGANIZAÇÃO DAS NAÇÕES UNIDAS. Declaração Universal dos Direitos Humanos. Disponível em < http://www.ohchr.org/EN/UDHR/Documents/UDHR_Translations/por.pdf >. Acesso em: 15 fev. 2016.
ONU – ORGANIZAÇÃO DAS NAÇÕES UNIDAS. Pacto Internacional dos Direitos Civis e Políticos. Disponível em < http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/decreto/1990-1994/d0592.htm >. Acesso em: 15 fev. 2016.
PASQUALUCCI, Jo M., Criminal Defamation and the Evolution of the Doctrine of Freedom of Expression in International Law: Comparative Jurisprudence of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights. Vanderbilt Journal Transnational Law, v. 39, p. 379-433, 2006.
POWERS, Elizabeth. Freedom of speech: the history of an idea. Bucknell University Press: United Kingdom, 2011.
ROSENFELD, Michel. Hate Speech in Constitutional Jurisprudence. In: The content and context of hate speech. Cambridge University Press: New York, 2012. p. 242-289.
SALHANY, Roger E. The origin of rights. The Carswell Company Limited, 1986.
SUPREMA CORTE DOS ESTADOS UNIDOS. Bradenburg vs. Ohio 395 U.S. 444, 1969. Disponível em: < https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/395/444/case.html >. Acesso em: 10 jan. 2016.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18256/2238-0604.2018.v14i1.1788
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
ISSN 2238-0604
This Revista Brasileira de Direito is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Indexers