The evolution of standard essential patent litigation in India: from unfamiliar terrain to a structured forum
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18256/2238-0604.2026.v22i.5372Keywords:
standard essential patents; FRAND; Patents Act, 1970; interim relief; pro tem security; India.Abstract
Standards, knowingly or unknowingly govern our everyday life and make products easy to manufacture, easy to sell and easy to use. Standards facilitate comfortable travel, ease of living and keep the world interconnected. Patents are an integral part of the standardisation process and thus hold immense value. The global standardisation bodies have prescribed norms for licensing of standards on fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory terms – that are extremely futuristic. These terms ensure easy access to standardised technologies, while encouraging innovation through mandatory payment of royalties, instead of monopolisation. Standards are the unseen architecture of modern life, the silent protocols that allow a device fashioned by one hand to converse with a network built by another. In the last few years, India has become a part of this Standard-ecosystem which is integral to most countries and their economies. This article traces how a jurisdiction that began with almost no settled doctrine has, in little more than a decade, fashioned a coherent body of law for such patents. It follows the journey from the first tentative assertions against an industry scarcely aware that it owed anything, to a mature jurisdiction where the SEP owners and implementers are well aware of the adjudicatory processes, the legal principles which bind them and the manner in which they would obtain justice in a fair and transparent manner. India is now amongst the most neutral jurisdictions that is approached by SEP owners and implementers for resolution of their SEP disputes.
Downloads
References
AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL SALES PTE. LTD. v. REALTEK SEMICONDUCTOR CORP., Unified Patent Court, 2025.
BEKKERS, R.; DUYSTERS, G.; VERSPAGEN, B. Intellectual property rights, strategic technology agreements and market structure. Research Policy, 31, 1141-1161, 2002. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0048-7333(01)00189-5.
Communication Components Antenna Inc. v. Mobi Antenna Technologies (Shenzhen) Co. Ltd. & Ors., 2024:DHC:3975 (final judgment of 16 May 2024 awarding damages of about Rs. 217 crore).
Communication Components Antenna Inc. v. Rosenberger Hochfrequenztechnik GmbH & Co. KG & Ors., 2023:DHC:4582 (final judgment of 30 March 2026 awarding damages of about Rs. 152 crore).
Competition Commission of India v. Monsanto Holdings Pvt. Ltd. & Ors., Supreme Court of India, SLP(C) No. 25026/2023 (order of 2 September 2025).
CYBERMEDIA RESEARCH (CMR). India Mobile Handset Market Review, Q1 2025. Available at: https://cmrindia.com.
DEL PERAL-ROSADO, J. A. et al. Survey of Cellular Mobile Radio Localization Methods: From 1G to 5G. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 20, no. 2, 1124-1148, 2018. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1109/COMST.2017.2785181.
DHADWAL, Saloni; SINHA, Aman. Navigating SEP Licensing: A Comparison of International Approaches. ICRIER Policy Brief No. 38, May 2025. Available at: https://icrier.org.
Dolby International AB & Anr. v. Lava International Ltd., 2025:DHC:5426 (order of 10 July 2025).
Freebit AS v. Exotic Mile Private Limited, 2023:DHC:8213; appeal dismissed, FAO(OS)(COMM) 15/2024 (31 January 2024).
Fujitsu Ltd. v. Netgear Inc., 620 F.3d 1321 (Fed. Cir. 2010).
GUPTA, S.; TYAGI, K.; UPADHYAY, R. Twilight of voice, dawn of data: the future of telecommunications in India. DECISION, 45(2), 161-183, 2018. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40622-018-0181-0.
HIGH COURT OF DELHI. Intellectual Property Rights Division Rules, 2022, Notification No. 13/Rules/DHC, 24 February 2022 (as corrected by Corrigendum No. 63/Rules/DHC, 11 April 2022). Available at: https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/files/Notifications%20and%20Practice%20Directions/notificationfile_wd6kndkfb4g.pdf.
HIGH COURT OF DELHI. Rules Governing Patent Suits, 2022, Notification No. 14/Rules/DHC, Delhi Gazette (Extraordinary), Part II-I, 24 February 2022. Available at: https://egazette.nic.in/WriteReadData/2022/233727.pdf.
HUANG, E. M. et al. Understanding Mobile Phone Situated Sustainability: The Influence of Local Constraints and Practices on Transferability. IEEE Pervasive Computing, 8, 46-53, 2009. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1109/mprv.2009.19.
INDIA. The Commercial Courts Act, 2015 (Act No. 4 of 2016).
INDIA. The Patents Act, 1970 (Act No. 39 of 1970).
InterDigital Technology Corporation & Ors. v. Xiaomi Corporation & Ors., 2021 SCC OnLine Del 2424 (anti-anti-suit injunction).
InterDigital Technology Corporation v. Guangdong Oppo, 2024:DHC:1338; and Guangdong Oppo v. InterDigital, 2024:DHC:4547-DB.
InterDigital Technology Corporation v. Guangdong Oppo, 2024:DHC:7244 (disclosure of comparable licences).
InterDigital Technology Corporation v. Xiaomi Corporation, 2020 SCC OnLine Del 1633 (confidentiality club).
Intex Technologies (India) Ltd. v. Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson, 2023:DHC:2243-DB.
JONES, A. Standard-Essential Patents: FRAND Commitments, Injunctions and the Smartphone Wars. SSRN Electronic Journal, 2014. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2394495.
K.K. Bansal v. Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V., 2026:DHC:4317-DB (setting aside the judgment of 12 July 2018).
Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. v. Rajesh Bansal & Ors., 2018:DHC:4111, set aside by the Division Bench in K.K. Bansal v. Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V., 2026:DHC:4317-DB.
Koninklijke Philips N.V. v. M. Bathla & Anr., 2025:DHC:9079 (the first reported finding of non-infringement in an Indian SEP dispute).
Koninklijke Philips N.V. v. Maj. (Retd.) Sukesh Behl & Ors., 2025:DHC:1144.
Lava International Ltd. v. Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (PUBL), 2024:DHC:2698; costs order of 2 August 2024.
MALIK, Payal; SINHA, Aman; DHADWAL, Saloni; SAREEN, Jayati; JAGADEESH, Harishankar. Cellular Network Standard Essential Patents: A Study of the Indian Ecosystem. ICRIER, September 2025. Available at: https://icrier.org/pdf/Cellular-Network-Standard-Essential-Patents_A%20Study-of-the-Indian-Ecosystem.pdf.
Malikie Innovations Ltd. & Anr. v. Xiaomi Corporation & Ors., 2026:DHC:3671 (order of 30 April 2026, directing pro tem security of about Rs. 272 crore).
Nokia Technologies Oy v. Guangdong Oppo, 2022:DHC:4935 (the four-fold test, paragraph 77).
Nokia Technologies Oy v. Guangdong Oppo Mobile Telecommunications Corp. Ltd. & Ors., 2024:DHC:1291 (Division Bench, directing pro tem security).
Panasonic Holdings Corporation v. Xiaomi Technology UK Ltd., [2024] EWCA Civ 1143.
PAWLICKI, P. Challenger Multinationals in Telecommunications: Huawei and ZTE. SSRN Electronic Journal, 2017. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2934191.
PRESS INFORMATION BUREAU, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA. Building a Viksit Bharat with 6G. PRID 2182603, October 2025. Available at: https://pib.gov.in/PressReleasePage.aspx?PRID=2182603.
RAJAGOPALA AYYANGAR, N. Report on the Revision of the Patents Law. Government of India, September 1959. Available at: https://ipindia.gov.in/storage/uploads/media/1959-_Justice_N_R_Ayyangar_committee_report.pdf.
SIDAK, J. Gregory. FRAND in India: The Delhi High Court’s emerging jurisprudence on royalties for standard-essential patents. Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, vol. 10, no. 8, 609-618, August 2015. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpv096.
SINGH, Prathiba M. Prathiba M. Singh on Patent Law. Thomson Reuters, 2024, Vol. 1.
Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson v. Competition Commission of India, 2023:DHC:4783-DB.
Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (Publ) v. Mercury Electronics & Anr., CS(OS) 442/2013 (order of 6 March 2013).
TELECOM REGULATORY AUTHORITY OF INDIA. Telecom Subscription Data as on May, 2026. Press Release No. 78 of 2026, 25 June 2026. Available at: https://www.trai.gov.in/sites/default/files/2026-06/PR_No78of2026_0.pdf.
VAN DE KAA, G.; GREEVEN, M. J. Mobile telecommunication standardization in Japan, China, the United States, and Europe: a comparison of regulatory and industrial regimes. Telecommunication Systems, 65, 181-192, 2017. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11235-016-0214-y.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Prathiba M. Singh

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
I declare the present article unpublished, as well as not be subject to any other submission process to another scientific journal.
I declare that I authorize the publication of the article by the magazine on the World Wide Web and the knowledge about non-remuneration by virtue of its publication, with no copyright of an equity nature.
Also, as author, I take civil and criminal responsibility for the content of the published work, after reading the guidelines for authors and agreeing with them.
The work can be accessed by any interested party and reproduced and / or published provided that proper reference is made according to the ABNT for the purpose of dissemination of scientific academic production.
