Enviar artigo via e-mail 
Law Actually: Practical Reason, Anarchism and the Legal Rule-Compliance Phenomenon / O direito real: razão prática, anarquismo e o fenômeno da conformidade legal
Resumo
Law transforms our lives in the most important way: it changes how we act and because of this it gives rise to fundamental questions. One such question concerns legal authority and individual autonomy and asks; if we are autonomous agents how do legislators, judges and officials have legitimate authority to change our actions and indirectly change how we conduct our lives? The strategy of this article is to focus on the agent, i.e. the addressee of the legal command or directive who performs the action requested by the legal official. This strategy is bottom-up, from the level of agency and practical reason to the justificatory framework of authority.
Key words: Individual Autonomy; Legal authority; Compliance Phenomenon.
Resumo: O Direito transforma nossas vidas do modo mais importante: ele altera como nós agimos e, por causa disso, exsurgem uma série de questões fundamentais. Uma dessas questões se relaciona à autoridade do Direito e à liberdade individual, fazendo surgir a pergunta: se nós somos dotados de autonomia como indivíduos, como os legisladores, juízes e agentes públicos possuem autoridade legítima para mudar nossas ações e indiretamente alterar o modo como conduzimos nossas vidas? O objetivos deste artigo é focar no indivíduo, isto é, no destinatário do comando legal que pratica a ação requisitada pelo agente da lei. A estratégia, dessa forma, partir de baixo para cima, do nível do agente e da razão prática até o quadro justificador de autoridade.
Palavras-chave: Autonomia individual; Autoridade legal; Fenômeno de Compliance.
Referências
ANSCOMBE, E. Intention. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2000. §2 0.
ARISTOTLE’S. Metaphysics, book advanced by Frede and Makin, see (n 2).
AQUINAS, Summa Theologiæ. Translated by Thomas Gilby, Latin and English text, paperback edition, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006, Q17, 5.
ARISTOTLE. Metaphysics Book . Oxford: Clarendon Press, Clarendon Aristotle Series, 2006. p. 133.
CHISHOLM, R. ‘Freedom and Action’. In: LEHRER, K. (ed.) Freedom and Determinism. New York: Random House, 1976, and Stout, R., Action. Bucks: Acumen, 2005.
COOPE, U. ‘Change and its Relation to Actuality and Potentiality’ In: A Companion to Aristotle. Anagnostopoulos, G. (ed.). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2009, p. 277.
FREDE, M. ‘Aristotle’s Notion of Potentiality in Metaphysics ‘, Unity, Identity and Explanation in Aristotle’s Metaphysics. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994.
KORSGAARD, C.. Sources of Normativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
KORSGAARD, C. Self-Constitution: Agency, Identity and Integrity (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.
KOSMAN, L.A. ‘Aristotle’s Definition of Motion’, Phronesis (1969): 40 and
RAZ, Joseph. Engaging Reason. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999. p. 67.
ROSS, W.D. Aristotle’s Physics: A Revised Text with Introduction and Commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995.
SHAPIRO, S. Legality. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2011, for an attempt to show that legal systems are created by collective intentions of planners (legislators and judges).
VELLEMAN, D. Practical Reflection. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1989. VELLEMAN, D., The Possibility of Practical Reason. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.
WOLFF, R.P. In Defense of Anarchism. New York and London: Harper Torchbooks, 1970. p. 9.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18256/2238-0604/revistadedireito.v11n1p7-19
Apontamentos
- Não há apontamentos.
