Online Body Shaming: análise de casos e prospecção de proteção

Angelo Maietta

Abstract


Body shaming on the web and on social media is indeed a particular form of violence to the person, which targets the victim’s physical characteristics which therefore are disregarded and denigrated, often with the purpose of arousing in that person a sense of shame about his/her physical appearance.
The protection of rights on the web is one of the issues mainly animating the legal debate and at the same time a matter characterized by objective difficulties not only as regards the classification of concrete cases within traditional abstract patterns, but also due to the intrinsic characteristics of the network, obstacles to the creation of a real and effective protection. The non-territoriality of the internet, or as part of the doctrine prefers, its “Omni-territoriality”, sets serious problems about the identification of the competent court and applicable law, as well as the recourse to anonymity often makes it difficult, if not impossible, to detect the real identity of the authors of illegal behaviours on the network injuring the rights of third parties


Keywords


Body shaming; Protection of rights on web; Non-territoriality

Full Text:

PDF

References


ABBONDANTE, Fulvia. Il ruolo dei social network nella lotta all’hate speech: un’analisi comparata fra l’esperienza statunitense e quella europea. Informatica e diritto, Florença, v. XXVI, n. 1-2, p. 41-68, 2017.

COLANGELO, Riccardo Michele. La legge sul cyberbullismo. Considerazioni informatico-giuridiche e comparatistiche. Informatica e diritto, Florença, v. XXVI, n. 1-2, p. 397-418, 2017.

CORTESE, Anthony. Opposing hate speech. Nova York: Praeger, 2006.

FALLETTA, Pietro. Il contrasto all’hate speech. In MENSI, Maurizio; FALLETTA, Pietro. Il diritto del web. 2. ed. Padova: CEDAM, 2018.

FEBRIANA, Trisna; BUDIARTO, A. Twitter Dataset for Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection in Indonesian Language. In 2019 International Conference on Information Management and Technology (ICIMTech), 2019. Jacarta/Bali: IEEE, 2019. p. 379-382.

FIORIGLIO, Gianluigi. Il diritto alla privacy. Nuove frontiere nell’era di internet. Bononia: University Press, 2008.

GAGLIARDONE, Iginio; GAL, Danit; ALVES, Thiago; Martinez, Gabriela. Countering online hate speech. Paris: United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization, 2015.

GARD, Stephen. Fighting words as free speech. Washington University Law Review, Washington, v. 58, p. 531, 1980.

GELBER, Katharine. Speaking back: the free speech versus the hate speech debate. Philadelphia: John Benjamins publishing Company, 2002.

GRANDI, Ciro. Le conseguenze penalistiche delle condotte di cyberbullismo. Un’alnalisi de jure condito. Annali online della didattica e della Formazione Docente, Ferrara, v. 9, n.13, p. 40-58, 2017.

LABANCA, Marisa. Lizzo contro i bodyshamer: “Sono bella, sono forte. In: La repubblica, 11 jun. 2020. Retrieved from: https://d.repubblica.it/beauty/2020/06/11/news/lizzo_contro_il_bodyshaming_video_virale_tiktok-4742662. Access: 26 nov. 2020.

MAIETTA, Angelo. Il diritto della multimedialità.Torino: Giappichelli, 2018.

MARTINELLI, Silvia. Diritto all’oblio e motori di ricerca. Memoria e privacy nell’era digitale. Milão: Giuffrè, 2015.

MENSI. Maurizio; FALLETTA, Pietro. Il diritto del web. Padova: CEDAM, 2018.

MERAVIGLIA, Marinella Fumagali .Diritto alla riservatezza e progresso tecnologico. Coesistenza pacifica o scontro di civiltà?.Napoli: Editoriale Scientifica, 2015.

NEVIN, William. Fighting words and the question criminally punishable racial epithets. First Amendment Law Review, v. 14, n. 3, 2018.

PETRUSO, Rosario. La responsabilità degli intermediari della rete telematica: I modelli statunitense ed europeo a confronto. Torino: Giappichelli, 2018.

PITRUZZELLA, Giovanni; POLLICINO, Oreste; QUINTARELLI, Stefano. Parole e potere: libertà d’espressione, hate speech e fake news. Milano: Egea, 2017.

PIZZETTI, Franco. Internet e la tutela della persona: Il caso del motore di ricerca. Firenze: Bagno a Ripoli, 2015.

RING, Caitlin Elizabeth. Hate speech in social media: an exploration of the problem and its proposed solutions.2013. A dissertation submitted of the requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Journalism and Mass Communication, University of Colorado, Colorado, 2013. Retrieved from: https://scholar.colorado.edu/downloads/n870zr009. Access: 26 nov. 2020.

ROSENFELD, Michel. Hate speech in constitutional jurisprudence: a comparative analysis. Cardozo Law Review, New York, v. 24, p. 1523, 2003.

SICA, Salvatore; ZENCOVICH, Vicenzo Zeno. Manuale di diritto dell’informazione e della comunicazione. Padova: CEDAM, 2015.

STONE, Geoffrey R. Hate speech and the Us Constitution. East European Constitutional Review, Chicago ,v. 3, p. 78 ,1994.

VINCI, Alessandro. Chi è Armine Harutyunyan, modella Gucci vittima di body shaming e foto taroccate. In Corriere Della Sera, 31 ago. 2020. Retrieved from: https://www.corriere.it/tecnologia/20_agosto_31/chi-armine-harutyunyan-modella-gucci-vittima-body-shaming-accusata-falsi-saluti-romani-024737bc-eb77-11ea-a81e-046321e92fb6.shtml.Access: 26 nov. 2020.

WALDRON, Jeremy. The harm in hate speech. Cambridge: Harvard University press, Cambridge, 2012.

WEBER, Theophile J. New limits to the clear and present danger doctrine. Wioming Law Journal, Laramie, v. 4, n. 2, p. 130, 1949. Retrieved from: https://scholarship.law.uwyo.edu/wlj/vol4/iss2/11. Access: 26 nov. 2020.

WERTHEIMER, Aviva O. The First Amendment Distinction between Conduct and Content: A Conceptual Framework for Understanding Fighting Words Jurisprudence. Fordham Law Review, New York, v. 63, p. 793, 1994. Retrieved from: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/flr/vol63/iss3/4. Access: 26 nov. 2020.

WILLHOCK, Rita Kirk; SLAYDEN, David. Hate speech. Non Journal: California, 1995.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.18256/2238-0604.2021.v17i3.4470

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




ISSN 2238-0604

Licença Creative Commons

This Revista Brasileira de Direito is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Indexers

Periódicos CAPES  googlelogo_scholar.png
DOAJ.jpg
 
Diadorim.jpg
 dialnet.png
latindex.jpg
 
 logos_DOI_CrossRef_CrossChek.png

 
circ.png
 miar.png

logo_base.gif
 
 logos_DOI_CrossRef_CrossChek.png
CiteFactor2.png
 
Scilit logo