Brief reflections on legal pluralism as a key paradigm of contemporary law in highly differentiated western societies

Maria Chiara Locchi

Resumo


Many scholars, from different disciplines, use the category of “legal pluralism” to explain the legal dimension of Western societies’ increasing cultural, religious and social differentiation. As a particularly complex concept, the notion of “legal pluralism” requires to be deeply investigated in order to better understand its many implications and increase its explanatory potential as a paradigm for understanding the legal complexity of highly diversified societies. In this regard, the contribution of Italian legal scholarship offers precious inspiration.  On the one hand, Santi Romano – a legal thinker active in the first half of the 20th century –can be considered one of the founding fathers of legal pluralism: with his masterpiece L’ordinamento giuridico (1918), he delved into the issue of legal pluralism from an anti-formalist perspective, in opposition to legal positivism. On the other hand, the works of Paolo Grossi – a distinguished historian of law who addressed legal pluralism as a characteristic of law in the Middle Ages – are also very important for the study of law in contemporary Europe, since he criticizes the dominant legal reductionism and promotes the objective dimension of law as a social institution.

Texto completo:

PDF HTML (English)

Referências


ALPA, Guido. Paolo Grossi: alla ricerca dell’ordine giuridico. In ALPA, Guido (Coor.). Paolo Grossi. Ed. Roma-Bari: Laterza, 2011.

BOBBIO, Norberto. Teoria e ideologia nella dottrina di Santi Romano. In: BOBBIO, Norberto. Dalla struttura alla funzione. Nuovi studi di teoria del diritto. Ed. Roma-Bari: Laterza, 2007 (or. ed. 1975).

CROCE, Mariano. Self-sufficiency of Law. A Critical-Institutional Theory of Social Order. Ed. London: Springer, 2012.

FACCHI Alessandra, Customary and Religious Law: Current Perspectives in Legal Pluralism, 2007, .

FARALLI, Carla, FACCHI, Alessandra. Pluralità delle fonti e modelli teorici: dalle premesse storiche agli sviluppi attuali. In: PATTARO, Enrico. Problemi della produzione e dell’attuazione normativa. Ricerca Murst ex 40%, 1997, .

FONTANELLI, Filippo. Santi Romano and L’ordinamento giuridico: The Relevance of a Forgotten Masterpiece for Contemporary International, Transnational and Global Legal Relations. Transnational Legal Theory, 2(1), 2011, p. 67-117.

GARRÉ, Roy. Non di solo diritto. Spunti di riflessione, ad uso della storia giuridica, sul rapporto fra diritto ed altri ordinamenti normativi. Forum Historiae Iuris. 14 Feb. 2003.

GRIFFITHS, John. What is Legal Pluralism? Journal of Legal Pluralism. v. 24, 1986, p. 1-55.

GROSSI, Paolo. Ordinamento. Jus. v. LIII, n. 1, 2006, p. 1-12.

GROSSI, Paolo. A History of European Law. Ed. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010 (or. ed. 2007).

GROSSI, Paolo. “Lo Stato moderno e la sua crisi” (a cento anni dalla prolusione pisana di Santi Romano). Rivista trimestrale di diritto pubblico. v. LXI, n. 1, 2011a, p. 1-22.

GROSSI, Paolo. Un impegno per il giurista di oggi: ripensare le fonti del diritto, in ALPA, Guido (Coor.). Paolo Grossi. Ed. Roma-Bari: Laterza, 2011b.

GROSSI, Paolo. Introduzione al Novecento giuridico. Ed. Roma-Bari: Laterza, 2012.

HAURIOU, Maurice. L’institution et le droit statutaire. Récueil de Législation de Toulouse, 2e série, T. 11, p. 134-182, 1906.

HAURIOU, Maurice. Principes de droit public. Ed. Paris: Librairie de la Société du recueil J.-B. Sirey & du journal du palais, p. xi-734, 1910.

ITZCOVITCH, Giulio. Ordinamento giuridico, pluralismo giuridico, principi fondamentali. L’Europa e il suo diritto in tre concetti. Diritto pubblico comparato e europeo. n. 1, 2009, p. 34-60.

KISLOWICZ, Howard. Sacred Laws in Earthly Courts: Legal Pluralism in Canadian Religious Freedom Litigation. Queen’s Law Journal. v. 39, n. 1, 2013, p. 175-222.

KLEINHANS, Martha-Marie, MACDONALD, Roderick A. What is a Critical Legal Pluralism? Canadian Journal of Law and Society, v. 12, p. 25-46, Fall 1997.

LA TORRE, Massimo. Law as Institution. Ed. London: Springer, 2010.

PAFFARINI, Jacopo. Fundamental rights and migration of judicial models in the conditionality of investment treaties and transnational public policies. The cambodian case. Revista Brasileira de Direito, Passo Fundo, v. 10, n. 1, p. 33-47, dez. 2014. Disponível em: < https://seer.imed.edu.br/index.php/revistadedireito/article/view/630 >. Acesso em: 10 jul. 2014.

PAULSSON, Jan. The Idea of Arbitration. Ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2013.

ROCHER, Guy. Pour une sociologie des ordres juridiques. Cahiers de droit. n. 1, 1988, p. 91-120.

ROMANO, Santi. L’ordinamento giuridico, Ed. Firenze: Sansoni, 1967 (or. ed. 1918).

ROMANO, Santi. Frammenti di un dizionario giuridico. Ed. Milano: Giuffrè, 1983 (or. ed. 1947).

ROSATI, Massimo. Post-secular society, transnational religious civilizations and legal pluralism. Philosophy & Social Criticism. v. 36, n. 3-4, 2010, p. 413-423.

SANDULLI, Aldo. Santi Romano and the Perception of the Public Law Complexity. Italian Journal of Public Law, 1(1), p. 1-38, 2009.

VANDERLINDEN, Jacques. Return to Legal Pluralism: Twenty Years Later. Journal of Legal Pluralism, n. 28, p. 149-157, 1989.

VERTOVEC, Steven, Vertovec. Super-diversity and its implications. Ethnic and Racial Studies, v. 30, n. 6, p. 1024-1054, Nov. 2007.

ZANETTI, Gianfrancesco. Italian Normative Pluralism: What is Unique about the Future of Italy. California Italian Studies, 2(1), 2011.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.18256/2238-0604/revistadedireito.v10n2p74-84

Apontamentos

  • Não há apontamentos.


Bookmark and Share