A prática do Tribunal Europeu de Direitos Humanos na esfera juridicidade de detenção de indivíduos socialmente desajustados

Igor Olegovich Anisimov, Elena Evgenyevna Gulyaeva

Resumo


O artigo aborda a prática do Tribunal Europeu de Direitos Humanos na esfera da juridicidade de detenção sobre cinco categorias de indivíduos, os quais são referidos no artigo 5 (1) (e) da Convenção Europeia para Proteção de Direitos Humanos e Liberdades Fundamentais de 1950. Os autores estudam os objetivos e os critérios para a detenção de pessoas infectadas, com deficiência mental, alcoólatras, drogados e vagabundos. Adicionalmente, os autores estudam o posicionamento de peritos russos sobre a temática. Conclui-se que sobre o artigo 5(1) (e) da convenção que é lícita a detenção dessas pessoas visto que evita perigos que possam ser causados contra terceiros e a si mesma.


Palavras-chave


Detenção preventiva; individual socialmente desajustados; cláusulas restritivas

Texto completo:

PDF (English)

Referências


CCPR. General Comment Nº 8 of 27 July 1982: Right to liberty and security of persons (Art. 9). United Nations Human Rights. Available from: http://www.unhchr.ch/tbs/doc.nsf/0/f4253f9572cd4700c12563ed00483bec?Opendocument. Access in: 27 out. 2020.

CCPR. General Comment Nº 8 of 27 July 1982: Right to liberty and security of persons (Art. 9). United Nations Human Rights. Available from: http://www.unhchr.ch/tbs/doc.nsf/0/f4253f9572cd4700c12563ed00483bec?Opendocument. Access in: 27 out. 2020.

ECHR. B. v. the United Kingdom. Application no. 6870/75. Report of 7 October 1981. Available from: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/fre#{%22itemid%22:[%22002-3739%22]}. Access in: 27 out. 2020.

ECHR. De Wilde, Ooms and Versyp v. Вelgium. Applications nos. 2832/66; 2835/66; 2899/66. Judgment of 18 June 1971. Available from: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/fre#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-57606%22]}. Access in: 27 out. 2020.

ECHR. Guzzardi v. Italy. Application no. 7367/76.Judgment of 6 November 1980. Available from: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/fre#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-57498%22]}. Access in: 27 out. 2020.

ECHR. Hilda Hafsteinsdóttir v. Iceland. Application no. 40905/98. Judgment of 8 June 2004. Available from: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/fre#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-61813%22]}. Access in: 27 out. 2020.

ECHR. Ilnseher against Germany. Application No. 10211/12 и 27505/14, Judgment of 4 December. Available from : https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/fre#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-187540%22. Access in: 27 out. 2020.

ECHR. Léger v. France.Application no. 19324/02. Judgment of 11 April 2006. Available from: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/fre#{%22itemid%22:[%22003-1636723-1714833%22]}. Access in: 27 out. 2020.

ECHR. McVeigh and Others v. United Kingdom. Application nos. 8022/77, 8025/77, 8027/77. Decision of 18 March 1981. Available from: http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/app/conversion/pdf/?library=ECHR&id=001-95663&filename=001-95663.pdf. Access in: 27 out. 2020.

ECHR. Mubilanzila Mayeka and Kaniki Mitunga v. Belgium. Application no. 13178/03, Judgment of 12 October 2006. Available from: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/FRE#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-77447%22]}. Access in: 27 out. 2020.

ECHR. Nowicka v. Poland. Application no. 30218/96. Judgment of 3 December 2002. Available from: http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/app/conversion/pdf/?library=ECHR&id=001-60791&filename=001-60791.pdf. Access in: 27 out. 2020.

ECHR. Sawoniuk v. the United Kingdom Application no. 36716/00. Decision of 29 May 2001. Available from: http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/app/conversion/pdf/?library=ECHR&id=001-5878&filename=001-5878.pdf. Access in: 27 out. 2020.

ECHR. T. v. the United Kingdom. Application no. 24724/94. Judgment of 16 December 1999. Available from: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/fre#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-5105%22]}. Access in: 27 out. 2020.

ECHR. V. v. the United Kingdom. Application no. 24888/94. Report of 4 December 1998. Available from: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/fre#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-58035%22]}. Access in: 27 out. 2020.

ECHR. Vasileva v. Denmark. Application no. 52792/99, ECHR Judgment of 25 September 2003. Available from: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/fre#%7B%22display%22:[2],%22itemid%22:[%22002-4699%22]%7D. Access in: 27 out. 2020.

ECHR. Weeks v. The United Kingdom. Application no. 9787/82. Judgment of 2 March 1987. Available from: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/fre#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-57594%22]}. Access in: 27 out. 2020.

ECHR. Weeks v. The United Kingdom. Application no. 9787/82. Judgment of 2 March 1987. Available from: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/fre#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-57594%22]}. Access in: 27 out. 2020.

ECHR. Witold Litwa v. Poland. Application no. 26629/95. Judgment of 4 April 2000. Available from: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/fre#{%22itemid%22:[%22002-6873%22]}. Access in: 27 out. 2020.

ECHR. X. v. Austria. Application no. 4280/69. Decision of 13 July 1970. Available from: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/fre?i=001-3166. Access in: 27 out. 2020.

ECHR. X. v. the United Kingdom. Application no. 6998/75. Report of 16 July 1980. Available from: http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/app/conversion/pdf/?library=ECHR&id=001-74270&filename=001-74270.pdf. Access in: 27 out. 2020.

FRANKOWSKI S; SHELTON, D. Preventive Detention: a Comparative and International Law Perspective. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1992.

HARDING Andrew; HATCHARD, John. Preventive Detention and Security Law: a Comparative Survey. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1993.

JAYAWICKRAMA, Nihal. The Judicial Application of Human Rights Law: National, Regional and International Jurisprudence. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2002.

MATUZOV, N.I. Teoriia gosudarstva i prava: Uchebnik. Moscow: Yurist, 2003.

MURDOCH, Jim. Article 5 of the European Convention on Human Rights: The Protection of Liberty and Security of Person. Strasbourg: Council of Europe, 2002.

NIKITIN, A.A. Spetsial’nyi pravovoi status marginal’nykh grupp. In Vestnik Saratovskoy gosudarstvennoy yuridicheskoy akademii. Saratov State Law Academy Bulletin, v. 2, 2005.

OKSAMYTNYI, V.V. Pravomernoe povedenie lichnosti. Kiev: Naukova Dumka, 1985.

SENIAKIN, I.N; NIKITIN, A.A. Problemy otvetstvennosti gosudarstvennoi vlasti za marginal’noe polozhenie lichnosti v obshchestve. In Vestnik Saratovskoy gosudarstvennoy yuridicheskoy akademii. Saratov State Law Academy Bulletin, v. 6, 2008.

STARMER, Keir. European Human Rights Law. The Human Rights Act 1998 and the European Convention on Human Rights. London: Legal Action Group, 1999.

TEMBOTOVA, M.A. Reestr novykh potentsial’no opasnykh psikhoaktivnykh veshchestv, oborot kotorykh v Rossiiskoi Federatsii zapreshchen. Aktual’nye problemy rossiiskogo prava, v. 2, 2008.

UNITED NATIONS. General Assembly. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights. New York: UN. Available from: https://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/Convention_ENG.pdf. Access in: 27 out. 2020.

VIENNA. Convention on the Law of Treaties. 22 maio 1969. Available from: https://www.trans-lex.org/500600/_/vienna-convention-on-the-law-of-treaties-of-1969. Access in: 27 de out. de 2020.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.18256/2238-0604.2022.v18i2.4748

Apontamentos

  • Não há apontamentos.


Bookmark and Share