Capacidade Absortiva e Ecossistema de Inovação: Um Estudo Bibliométrico

Luciano Vieira Vieira, Jorge Oneide Sausen, Gloria Charão Ferreira

Resumo


As constantes mudanças do ambiente de negócios têm mobilizado pesquisadores a investigarem fatores que levam as empresas a inovarem e alcançarem níveis superiores de desempenho. Nesse contexto, a capacidade absortiva e os ecossistemas de inovação têm sido apontados como elementos propulsores deste processo. O objetivo deste artigo é mapear o perfil da pesquisa científica sobre capacidade absortiva e ecossistema de inovação. Foram coletados dados da base Web of Science do período entre 2010 até 2021. Ao refinar a análise, foram mantidas 38 referências na análise fatorial exploratória e posterior construção da rede. A técnica metodológica empregada foi a bibliometria, pela análise de cocitações. Para executar a cocitação, foram utilizadas as referências dos 68 artigos encontrados totalizando 7.101 cocitações. Foram mantidas as comunalidades e cargas fatorais superiores a 0,5, e, em seguida, as cargas cruzadas foram excluídas. Os resultados permitiram observar que os três fatores de maior representatividade para o tema são: 1) formado por estudos sobre inovação aberta, relacionado principalmente com a necessidade de reconceituação, sendo observados estudos relacionados às teorias de gestão e do conhecimento; 2) formado por estudos cujo foco é o conhecimento e a capacidade absortiva, elementos importantes para o processo de inovação e vantagem competitiva; 3) formado por estudos que consideram as relações interorganizacionais e a colaboração com o objetivo de obter resultados de inovação mais duradouros e a manutenção de vantagem competitiva sustentável. Desta forma, pretende-se contribuir para a literatura, ao tornar evidentes os principais autores e estudos relacionados ao tema.

Palavras-chave


Inovação; Capacidade Absortiva; Ecossistema de Inovação

Texto completo:

PDF

Referências


Adner, R., & Kapoor, R. (2010). Value creation in innovation ecosystems: how the structure of technological interdependence affects firm performance in new technology generations. Strategic Management Journal, 31(3), 306–333. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.821.

Afuah, A., & Tucci, C. L. (2012). Crowdsourcing as a solution to distant search. Academy of Management Review, 37(3), 355–375. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2010.0146.

Apriliyanti, I. D.; & Alon, I. (2017). Análise bibliométrica da Capacidade Absortiva. International Business Review, 26(5), 896-907. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2017.02.007.

Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108.

Bogers, M., Afuah, A., & Bastian, B. (2010). Users as innovators: a review, critique, and future research directions. Journal of Management, 36(4), 857–875. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206309353944.

Bogers, M., Zobel, A.-K., Afuah, A., Almirall, E., Brunswicker, S., Dahlander, L., … & Ter Wal, A. L. J. (2016). The open innovation research landscape: established perspectives and emerging themes across different levels of analysis. Industry and Innovation, 24(1), 8–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2016.1240068.

Boschma, R. (2005). Proximity and innovation: a critical assessment. Regional Studies, 39(1), 61–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/0034340052000320887.

Cassiman, B., & Valentini, G. (2015). Open innovation: are inbound and outbound knowledge flows really complementary? Strategic Management Journal, 37(6), 1034–1046. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2375.

Chesbrough, H., Kim, S., & Agogino, A. (2014). Chez Panisse: building an open innovation ecosystem. California Management Review, 56(4), 144–171. https://doi.org/10.1525/cmr.2014.56.4.144.

Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1989). Innovation and learning: the two faces of R & D. The Economic Journal, 99(397), 569-596. https://doi.org/10.2307/2233763.

Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128-152. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393553.

Cooke, P., Uranga, M. G., & Etxebarria, G. (1997). Regional innovation systems: Institutional and organisational dimensions. Research Policy, 26(4-5), 475–491. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0048-7333(97)00025-5.

D’Este, P., & Patel, P. (2007). University–industry linkages in the UK: what are the factors underlying the variety of interactions with industry? Research Policy, 36(9), 1295–1313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.05.002.

Dahlander, L., & Gann, D. M. (2010). How open is innovation? Research Policy, 39(6), 699–709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.013.

Eisenhardt, K. M., & Martin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: what are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21(10-11), 1105–1121. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0266(200010/11)21:10/11<1105::aid-smj133>3.0.co;2-e.

Enkel, E., Gassmann, O., & Chesbrough, H. (2009). Open R&D and open innovation: exploring the phenomenon. R&D Management, 39(4), 311–316. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2009.00570.x.

Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations. Research Policy, 29(2), 109–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0048-7333(99)00055-4.

Felizola, M. P. P. M., de Aragão, I. M. (2021). Revisão da literatura e formação de um modelo híbrido de ecossistema de inovação. Humanidades & Inovação, 8(49), 9-32.

Gawer, A. (2014). Bridging differing perspectives on technological platforms: Toward an integrative framework. Research Policy, 43(7), 1239–1249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.03.006.

Gawer, A., & Cusumano, M. A. (2013). Industry platforms and ecosystem innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(3), 417–433. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12105.

Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380. https://doi.org/10.1086/225469.

Grant, R. M. (1996). Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17(S2), 109–122. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250171110.

Guerrazzi, L. A. C., Brandão, M. M., Campos Junior, H., & Lourenço, C. E. (2015). Pesquisa em marketing e estratégia nos principais periódicos internacionais: um estudo bibliométrico sobre publicações no século XXI. Revista Ibero Americana de Estratégia, 14(1), 7-27. https://doi.org/10.5585/riae.v14i1.2200.

Huizingh, E. K. R. E. (2011). Open innovation: state of the art and future perspectives. Technovation, 31(1), 2–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2010.1.

Jansen, J., Van Den Bosch, V., & Volberba, H. (2005). Managing potential and realized absorptive capacity: how do organizational antecedents matter? Academy Management Journal, 48, 999-1015. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2005.19573106.

Jeppesen, L. B., & Lakhani, K. R. (2010). Marginality and problem-solving effectiveness in broadcast search. Organization Science, 21(5), 1016–1033. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1090.0491.

Kaiser, H. F. (1960). The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1), 141-151. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F001316446002000116.

Kogut, B., & Zander, U. (1992). Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organization Science, 3(3), 383–397. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.3.3.383.

Laursen, K., & Salter, A. (2005). Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among U.K. manufacturing firms. Strategic Management Journal, 27(2), 131–150. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.507.

Laursen, K., & Salter, A. J. (2014). The paradox of openness: appropriability, external search and collaboration. Research Policy, 43(5), 867–878. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.10.004.

McCain, K. W. (1990). Mapping authors in intellectual space: a technical overview. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 41(6), 433-443. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199009)41:6<433::AID-ASI11>3.0.CO;2-Q.

Mercan, B., & Götkaş, D. (2011). Components of innovation ecosystems: a cross-country study. International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, 76, 102-112.

Mintzberg, H., Ahlstrand, B., & Lampel, J. (2000). Safari estratégico: uma visita guiada através da natureza do mandamento estratégico. New York: Simon e Schuster.

Moore, J. F. (1993). Predators and prey: a new ecology of competition. Harvard Business Review, 71(3), 75-86.

Moore, J. F. (1996). O fim da concorrência: como dominar o ecossistema em que sua empresa está inserida. São Paulo: Futura.

Nerur, S. P., Rasheed, A. A., & Natarajan, V. (2008). The intellectual structure of the strategic management field: An author co-citation analysis. Strategic Management Journal, 29(3), 319-336. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.659.

OCDE. (2005). Manual de Oslo: diretrizes para coleta e interpretação de dados sobre inovação. Organizações para Cooperação e Desenvolvimento Econômico e Gabinete Estatístico das Comunidades Europeias.

Powell, W. W., Koput, K. W., & Smith-Doerr, L. (1996). Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: networks of learning in biotechnology. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(1), 116-145. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393988.

Ramos-Rodríguez, A. R., & Ruíz-Navarro, J. (2004). Changes in the intellectual structure of strategic management research: A bibliometric study of the Strategic Management Journal, 1980–2000. Strategic Management Journal, 25(10), 981-1004. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.397.

Randhawa, K., Wilden, R., & Hohberger, J. (2016). A bibliometric review of Open Innovation: setting a research agenda. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 33(6), 750–772. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12312.

Reise, S. P., Waller, N. G. & Comrey, A. L. (2000). Factor analysis and scale revision. Psychological Assessment, 12(3), 287-297. https://doi.org/10.1037//1040-3590.12.3.287.

Rohrbeck, R., Hölzle, K., & Gemünden, H. G. (2009). Opening up for competitive advantage - how Deutsche Telekom creates an open innovation ecosystem. R&D Management, 39(4), 420–430. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2009.00568.x.

Teece, D. J. (1986). Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Research Policy, 15(6), 285-305.

Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319–1350. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.640.

Todorova, G., & Durisin, B. (2007). Absorptive capacity: valuing a reconceptualization. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 774-786. https://doi.org/10.2307/20159334.

Tsai, W. (2001). Knowledge transfer in intraorganizational networks: effects of network position and absorptive capacity on business unit innovation and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 44(5), 996–1004. https://doi.org/10.2307/3069443.

Van de Vrande, V., Jong, J. P. J., Vanhaverbeke, W., & de Rochemont, M. (2009). Open innovation in SMEs: trends, motives and management challenges. Technovation, 29(6-7), 423–437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2008.10.001.

Volberda, H. W., Foss, N. J., & Lyles, M. A. (2010). PERSPECTIVE—Absorbing the concept of Absorptive Capacity: how to realize its potential in the organization field. Organization Science, 21(4), 931–951. doi:10.1287/orsc.1090.0503.

West, J., & Bogers, M. (2013). Leveraging external sources of innovation: a review of research on open innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(4), 814–831. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12125.

West, J., & Bogers, M. (2016). Open innovation: current status and research opportunities. Innovation, 19(1), 43–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/14479338.2016.1258995.

West, J., & Gallagher, S. (2006). Challenges of open innovation: the paradox of firm investment in open-source software. R&D Management, 36(3), 319–331. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2006.00436.x.

West, J., Salter, A., Vanhaverbeke, W., & Chesbrough, H. (2014). Open innovation: The next decade. Research Policy, 43(5), 805–811. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.03.001.

Zahra, S. A., & George, G. (2002). Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 185-203. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2002.6587995.

Zupic, I., & Čater, T. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429-472. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1094428114562629.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.18256/2237-7956.2022.v12i2.4704

Apontamentos

  • Não há apontamentos.


Bookmark and Share


Direitos autorais 2023 Luciano Vieira Vieira, Jorge Oneide Sausen, Gloria Charão Ferreira

Revista de Administração IMED (RAIMED)               ISSN: 2237-7956                Programa de Pós-Graduação em Administração (PPGA/Atitus)

Atitus Educação - Business School – www.imed.edu.br – Rua Senador Pinheiro, 304 – Bairro Vila Rodrigues – 99070-220 – Passo Fundo/RS – Brasil Tel.: +55 51 4004-4818

Licença Creative Commons

Esta obra está licenciada com uma Licença Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0 Internacional.