Email this article 
Managing Knowledge for Innovation: Proposals for a Mixed Economy Company
Abstract
This is an applied case study with a qualitative approach and a propositional objective. It presents analyses and proposals regarding the development and execution of projects within the Companhia de Desenvolvimento de Maricá (Codemar) based on the theory of organizational knowledge and the SECI model (Socialization, Externalization, Combination, and Internalization). The subjects of the study were executives involved in the projects analyzed. Data was collected through semi-structured interviews, and the analysis followed an inductive method. It was identified that the SECI spiral was not being completed adequately and that enabling conditions for promoting innovation were lacking. It is recommended that Codemar, in addition to internalizing innovations, develop specific solutions for the municipality of Maricá/RJ, systematically collecting regional needs and problems and improving knowledge management internally.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDF (Português (Brasil))References
Agência Nacional de Petróleo. (2020). Royalties. Brasília. https://www.gov.br/anp/pt-br/assuntos/royalties-e-outras-participacoes/royalties
Al-Abbadi, L., Alshawabkeh, R., & Rumman, A. (2020). Knowledge management processes and innovation performance: The moderating effect of employees’ knowledge hoarding. Management Science Letters, 10(7), 1463-1472. https://doi:10.5267/j.msl.2019.12.021
Brandão, S. M., & Bruno-Faria, M. D. F. (2017). Barreiras à inovação em gestão em organizações públicas do governo federal brasileiro: análise da percepção de dirigentes. http://repositorio.ipea.gov.br/handle/11058/8795
Damanpour, F., & Wischnevsky, J. D. (2006). Research on innovation in organizations: Distinguishing innovation-generating from innovation-adopting organizations. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 23(4), 269-291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2006.08.002
Farnese, M. L., Barbieri, B., Chirumbolo, A., & Patriotta, G. (2019). Managing knowledge in organizations: A Nonaka’s SECI model operationalization. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 506330. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02730
Hassan, N., & Raziq, A. (2019). Effects of knowledge management practices on innovation in SMEs. Management Science Letters, 9(7), 997-1008. http://doi:10.5267/j.msl.2019.4.005
Koch, P., & Hauknes, J. (2005). On innovation in the public sector–today and beyond. https://nifu.brage.unit.no/nifu-xmlui/bitstream/handle/11250/226573/d20-innovation.pdf?sequence=1
Manual de Oslo: diretrizes para coleta e interpretação de dados sobre inovação. Rio de Janeiro. http://www.finep.gov.br/images/apoio-e-financiamento/manualoslo.pdf
Ngoc-Tan, N., & Gregar, A. (2018). Impacts of knowledge management on innovation in higher education institutions: an empirical evidence from vietnam. Economics & Sociology, 11(3), 301-320. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-789X.2018/11-3/18
Nonaka, I. & Takeuchi, H. (1997). Criação de conhecimento na empresa. Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier.
Nonaka, I., Toyama, R., & Konno, N. (2000). SECI, Ba and leadership: a unified model of dynamic knowledge creation. Long Range Planning, 33(1), 5-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-6301(99)00115-6
Oliva, F. L., & Kotabe, M. (2019). Barriers, practices, methods and knowledge management tools in startups. Journal of Knowledge Management, 23(9), 1838-1856. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-06-2018-0361
Pereira, A. S., Siqueira, D., Senra, L., & Costa, N. M. (2020). As políticas públicas de economia solidária no município de Maricá/RJ. http://dx.doi.org/10.38116/bmt70/economiasolidaria3
Philip, J. (2018). An application of the dynamic knowledge creation model in big data. Technology in Society, 54, 120-127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2018.04.001
Philipson, S. (2019). The difficulty with which tacit knowing is transformed into explicit knowledge. World Review of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development, 15(3), 346-359. https://doi.org/10.1504/WREMSD.2019.099410
Ramjeawon, P. V, & Rowley, J. (2017). Knowledge management in higher education institutions: enablers and barriers in Mauritius. The Learning Organization, 24(5), 366-377. https://doi.org/10.1108/TLO-03-2017-0030
Silva, T. C., & Burger, F. (2018). Aprendizagem organizacional e inovação: contribuições da Gestão do Conhecimento para propulsionar um ambiente corporativo focado em aprendizagem e inovação. Navus: Revista de Gestão e Tecnologia, 8(1), 7-19. http://dx.doi.org/10.22279/navus.2018.v8n1.p07-19.569
Trevisan, L. C., & Damian, I. P. M. (2018). Gestão do conhecimento: diretrizes e práticas recomendadas às organizações. Ciência da Informação, 47(2). https://doi.org/10.18225/ci.inf.v47i2.4069
Yin, R. K. (2015). Estudo de caso: planejamento e métodos. Porto Alegre: Bookman.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18256/2237-7956.2024.v14i1.5047
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 Luiz Fernando Vieira Lemos, Favio Akiyoshi Toda, Saulo Barbara de Oliveira, Saulo Barroso Rocha
Revista de Administração IMED (RAIMED) ISSN: 2237-7956 Programa de Pós-Graduação em Administração (PPGA/Atitus)
Atitus Educação - Business School – www.imed.edu.br – Rua Senador Pinheiro, 304 – Bairro Vila Rodrigues – 99070-220 – Passo Fundo/RS – Brasil Tel.: +55 51 4004-4818
