Email this article 
Principles to Leadership Valuation (PLV): a strategic feedback tool applied in a college in the state of São Paulo, Brazil
Abstract
This work presents a feedback tool, the Principles to Leadership Valuation (PLV), through an exploratory and qualitative research, brings the analysis of the results of its application in a college. The request for self-assessment by the course leaders and responses to an on-line perception form was the solution found by the institution that was experiencing the moment of social isolation. The main objective of this study was to present PLV as an agent capable of contributing to the effective application of feedback and to generate results that indicate the level of professional maturity of the appraised and indicate the desired behavior for the manager. From it, it is possible to obtain reports on the leadership profile of the evaluated, considering their level of commitment and competence. The advantages are: usability, immediacy, minimizing subjectivity, synthesizing key indicators, and parameterizing for face-to-face conversation. The moment of crisis generated by the pandemic helped to make PLV a realistic instrument that considers the environmental variables which can directly influence people’s behavior.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDF (Português (Brasil))References
Andrews, M. C., & Kacmar, K. M. (2001). Organizations, confirmation and extension of the sources of feedback sacale in service-based. Journal of Business Communication, 38(2), 206–226.
Atwater, L. E., & Brett, J. F. (2005). Antecedents and consequences of reactions to developmental 360° feedback. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 66(3), 532–548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2004.05.003
Blanchard, K. H., Zigarmi, D., & Nelson, R. B. (1993). Situational leadership® after 25 years: a retrospective. Journal of Leadership Studies, 1(1), 21–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/107179199300100104
Chawla, N., Gabriel, A. S., Dahling, J. J., & Patel, K. (2016). Feedback dynamics are critical to improving performance management systems. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 9(2), 260–266. https://doi.org/10.1017/iop.2016.8
Gomes, G., Silveira, A., & Souza, M. J. B. de. (2013). Plano de marketing: um olhar mais acurado sobre a adoção em instituições de ensino superior brasileiras. Revista Gestão Universitária na América Latina, 6(2), 185–209. https://doi.org/10.5007/1983-4535.2013v6n2p185
Gonçalves, W. A., Corrêa, D. A., Spers, V. R. E., & Medeiros, I. T. (2014). Perspectivas teóricas da gestão de pessoas: (re)desenhando e (re)parametrizando suas práticas. Revista de Administração IMED, 4(2), 192–205. https://doi.org/10.18256/2237-7956/raimed.v4n2p192-205
Grimard, C. M. (2019). Lego mansion: an experiential exercise for understanding leadership styles. Developments in Business Simulation and Experiential Learning: Proceedings of the Annual ABSEL Conference, 46, 64–77. https://journals.tdl.org/absel/index.php/absel/article/view/3213
Hackman, J. R., & Lawler, E. E. (1971). Employee reactions to job characteristics. Journal of Applied Psychology, 55(3), 259–286. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0031152
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487
Hoffman, L. R., Hersey, P., & Blanchard, K. H. (1970). Management of organizational behavior. Administrative Science Quarterly, 15(2), 264. https://doi.org/10.2307/2391509
Mainardes, E. W., Miranda, C. S., Correia, C. H. Desenvolvimento, E., & Correia, C. H. (2011). A gestão estratégica de instituições de ensino superior: um estudo multicaso. Revista Contemporânea de Economia e Gestão, 9(1), 19–32. http://www.repositorio.ufc.br/handle/riufc/7433
Reddy, C. M., & Srinivasan, V. (2015). Dialogue on leadership development. IIMB Management Review, 27(1), 44–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iimb.2015.02.001
Rodrigues, A., Cesário, F., Castanheira, F., & Chambel, M. (2017). Gestão de desempenho: validação de um instrumento de medida. Revista de Ciências da Administração, 19(47), 57–74. https://doi.org/10.5007/2175-8077.2017v19n47p57
Russell, J. S., & Goode, D. L. (1988). An analysis of managers’ reactions to their own performance appraisal feedback. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73(1), 63–67. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.73.1.63
Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18(2), 119–144. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00117714
Schley, J., Zampier, M. A., Stefano, S. R., & Kuhl, M. R. (2015). Estilos de liderança: um estudo sobre a percepção dos funcionários de um supermercado da mesorregião central do Paraná. Revista de Administração IMED, 5(2), 139–152. https://doi.org/10.18256/2237-7956/raimed.v5n2p139-152
Thompson, G., & Vecchio, R. P. (2009). Situational leadership theory: a test of three versions. Leadership Quarterly, 20(5), 837–848. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.06.014
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18256/2237-7956.2021.v11i2.4392
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2022 Leticia Franco Martinez, Patricia Rodrigues Miziara Papa, Valéria Tomás de Aquino Paracchini, Thiago Henrique de Moraes
Revista de Administração IMED (RAIMED) ISSN: 2237-7956 Programa de Pós-Graduação em Administração (PPGA/Atitus)
Atitus Educação - Business School – www.imed.edu.br – Rua Senador Pinheiro, 304 – Bairro Vila Rodrigues – 99070-220 – Passo Fundo/RS – Brasil Tel.: +55 51 4004-4818
