El papel legitimador de los contenidos estereotipados en las diferencias salariales entre hombres y mujeres

Ana Karolyne Florencio Amorim, Andreza Conrado Conceição, Cicero Roberto Pereira, Emerson Araújo Do Bú

Resumen


La discriminación contra las mujeres es generalizada en las sociedades contemporáneas, y la persistente disparidad salarial para funciones idénticas en comparación con los hombres sugiere que este sesgo está socialmente justificado. Proponemos que los individuos evocan estereotipos de género de una manera que refuerza su tendencia a reafirmar las diferencias salariales de género. En dos estudios, analizamos cómo el acto de evocar justificaciones para contratar a alguien produce la disparidad salarial de género y si las justificaciones basadas en estereotipos median este efecto. En el Estudio 1 (N = 95), manipulamos el género de un candidato a un puesto de trabajo e identificamos que el simple acto de justificar la contratación influye en la disparidad salarial de género. En el Estudio 2 (N = 302), los participantes evocaron más estereotipos de competencia para un candidato a empleo masculino, y esta evocación medió la disparidad salarial de género. Discutimos el papel de la justificación basada en estereotipos en la disparidad de género en decisiones críticas dentro de contextos relacionados con el trabajo. Estos hallazgos tienen implicaciones para la comprensión de la discriminación contra las mujeres y para el desarrollo de políticas públicas orientadas a promover la igualdad de género.

Palabras clave


Discriminación Social; Sexismo; Desigualdad social

Texto completo:

PDF (English)

Referencias


Agerström, J., Björklund, F., Carlsson, R., & Rooth, D. (2012). Warm and competent Hassan = Cold and incompetent Eric: a harsh equation of real-life hiring discrimination. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 34(4), 359-366. https://doi.org/10.1080/01973533.2012.693438

Araújo, V. F., & Ribeiro, E. P. (2002) Diferenciais de salários por gênero no Brasil: uma análise regional. Revista Econômica do Nordeste, 33(2), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.61673/ren.2002.1748

Auspurg, K., Hinz, T., & Sauer, C. (2017). Why Should Women Get Less? Evidence on the Gender Pay Gap from Multifactorial Survey Experiments. American Sociological Review, 82(1), 179–210. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122416683393

Beyer, S. (2016). Low awareness of occupational segregation and the gender pay gap: No changes over a 16-year Span. Current Psychology, 37, 373–389. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-016-9521-4

Biernat, M., Manis, M., & Nelson, T. E. (1991). Stereotypes and standards of judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60(4), 485–499. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.60.4.485

Bishu, S. G., & Alkadry, M. G. (2016). A systematic review of the Gender Pay Gap and factors that predict it. Administration & Society, 49(1),65-104. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399716636928

Casado-Díaz, J. M., Driha, O., & Simón, H. (2022). The Gender Wage Gap in Hospitality: New Evidence From Spain. Cornell Hospitality Quarterly, 63(3), 399-417. https://doi.org/10.1177/1938965520971273

Connor, R. A., & Fiske, S. T. (2018). Not minding the gap: How hostile sexism encourages choice explanations for the gender income gap. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 43(1),22-36. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684318815468

Costa-Lopes, R., Dovidio, J. F., Pereira, C. R., & Jost, J. (2013). Social psychological perspectives on the legitimation of social inequality: Past, present and future. European Journal of Social Psychology, 43(4), 229-237. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.1966

Cuddy, A. J. C., Fiske, S. T., & Glick, P. (2004). When Professionals Become Mothers, Warmth Doesn’t Cut the Ice. Journal of Social Issues, 60(4), 701-718. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-4537.2004.00381.x

Cuddy, A. J. C., Glick, P., & Beninger, A. (2011). The dynamics of warmth and competence judgments and their outcomes in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 31, 73–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2011.10.004

Davison, H. K., & Burke, M. J. (2000). Sex Discrimination in Simulated Employment Contexts: A Meta-analytic Investigation. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 56, 225–248. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.1999.1711

Diekman, A. B., & Eagly, A. H. (2000). Stereotypes as Dynamic Constructs: Women and Men of the Past, Present, and Future. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(10), 1171–1188. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167200262001

Eagly, A. H., & Karau, S. J. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109(3), 573-598. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.109.3.573

Eagly, A. H., Nater, C., Miller, D. I., Kaufmann, M., & Sczesny, S. (2020). Gender stereotypes have changed: A cross-temporal meta-analysis of U.S. public opinion polls from 1946 to 2018. American Psychologist, 75(3), 301-315. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000494

Ellemers, N. (2018). Gender Stereotypes. Annual Review of Psychology, 69(1), 275-298. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-122216-011719

Fiske, S.T., Cuddy, A. J. C., Glick, P., & Xu, J. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(6), 878-902. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.82.6.878

Glick, P. (1991). Trait-Based and Sex-Based Discrimination in occupational prestige, occupational salary, and hiring. Sex Roles, 25(5-6), 351-378. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00289761

Glick, P., Zion, C., & Nelson, C. (1988). What mediates sex discrimination in hiring decisions?. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55(2), 178-186. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.55.2.178

Goldberg, P. (1968). Are women prejudiced against women?. Trans-action, 5, 28-30. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03180445

Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: a regression-based approach. The Guilford Press.

Hentschel, T., Heilman, M. E., & Peus, C. V. (2019). The multiple dimensions of gender stereotypes: A current look at men’s and women’s characterizations of others and themselves. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00011

Hogue, M., DuBois, C. L. Z., & Fox-Cardamone, L. (2010). Gender differences in pay expectations: the roles of job intention and self-view. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 34, 215–227. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2010.01563.x

Jost, J. T. (2019). A quarter century of system justification theory: Questions, answers, criticisms, and societal applications. British Journal of Social Psychology, 58, 263–314. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12297

Koch, A. J., D’Mello, S. D., & Sackett, P. R. (2015). A Meta-Analysis of Gender Stereotypes and Bias in Experimental Simulations of Employment Decision Making. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(1), 128–161. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036734

Masso, J., Meriküll, J., & Vahter, P. (2022). The role of firms in the gender wage gap. Jour Comparative Economics, 50(2): 454-473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2021.10.001

Moscatelli, S., Menegatti, M., Ellemers, N., Mariani, M. G., & Rubini, M. (2020). Men Should Be Competent, Women Should Have it All: Multiple Criteria in the Evaluation of Female Job Candidates. Sex Roles, Heilman 2012. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-019-01111-2

Olian, J. D., Schwab, D. P., & Haberfeld, Y. (1988). The Impact of Applicant Gender Compared to Qualifications on Hiring Recommendations: A Meta-analysis of Experimental Studies. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 41, 180- 195. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(88)90025-8

International Labour Organization (2019). A quantum leap for gender equality: For a better future of work for all. International Labour Office. Geneva, 1-146.

Pereira, C. R., Álvaro, J. L., & Vala, J. (2018). The Ego-Defensive role of legitimacy: How threat-based justifications protect the self-esteem of discriminators. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 44(10), 1473-1486. https://doi.org/10.1177/014616721877100

Pereira, C. R., Vala, J., & Costa-Lopes, R. (2010). From prejudice to discrimination: The legitimizing role of perceived threat in discrimination against immigrants. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 1231–1250. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.718

Phelan, J. E., Moss-Racusin, C. A., & Rudman, L. A. (2008). Competent Yet Out in the Cold: Shifting Criteria for Hiring Reflect Backlash Toward Agentic Women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 32(4), 406–413. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2008.00454.x

Rudman, L. A., Moss-Racusin, C. A., Phelan, J. E., & Nauts, S. (2012). Status incongruity and backlash effects: Defending the gender hierarchy motivates prejudice against female leaders. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(1), 165–179. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2011.10.008

Schoemann, A. M., Boulton, A. J., & Short, S. D. (2017). Determining Power and Sample Size for Simple and Complex Mediation Models. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617715068

Sin, I., Stillman, S., &Fabling, R (2022) What Drives the Gender Wage Gap? Examining the Roles of Sorting, Productivity Differences, Bargaining, and Discrimination. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 104 (4): 636–651. https://doi.org/10.1162/rest_a_01000

Verniers, C., & Vala, J. (2018). Justifying gender discrimination in the workplace: The mediating role of motherhood myths. PLoS ONE, 13(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal. pone.0190657

Williams, M. J., Paluck, E. L., & Spencer-Rodgers, J. (2010). The masculinity of money: Automatic stereotypes predict gender differences in estimated salaries. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 34(1), 7–20. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2009.01537.x

World Economic Forum (2021). Global Gender Gap Report 2021. Geneva, 1-405.

Zając, T., Magda, I., Bożykowski, M., Chłoń-Domińczak, A., & Jasiński, M. (2024). Gender pay gaps across STEM fields of study. Studies in Higher Education, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2024.2330667




DOI: https://doi.org/10.18256/2175-5027.2024.v16i1.5170

Enlaces refback

  • No hay ningún enlace refback.


Bookmark and Share


Copyright (c) 2024 Ana Karolyne Florencio Amorim

ISSN 2175-5027

Licencia de Creative Commons
La Revista de Psicologia da IMED está bajo una licencia de Creative Commons Reconocimiento 4.0 Internacional.

BASES DE DADOS E INDEXADORES

 DOAJ.jpg Periódicos CAPES
latindex.jpg
 
dialnet.png
 
REDIB
Diadorim.jpg
    SIS
circ.png