Envíe este artículo por correo electrónico 
La Influencia de las Creencias Conspirativas y Orientación Política Sobre la Vacunación
Resumen
El éxito de una política de vacunación depende no solo de los insumos materiales, sino también del respaldo de la población a las campañas. En Brasil, esto parece verse obstaculizado por la polarización política y la desinformación. Consciente de esto, esta investigación tuvo como objetivo investigar el efecto mediador de las creencias conspirativas sobre la pandemia y la información oficial en la relación entre la orientación política y la intención de vacunarse contra el COVID-19. La muestra estuvo conformada por 325 participantes que respondieron a medidas sobre creencias conspirativas, información oficial, intención de vacunar, orientación política y, finalmente, el cuestionario sociodemográfico. Los resultados mostraron que las creencias conspirativas sobre la pandemia y la información oficial tuvieron efectos mediadores en la relación entre la orientación política y la intención de vacunarse. Se concluye que las creencias conspirativas y la polarización política se han configurado como un problema de salud pública en Brasil y que pueden obstaculizar el respaldo de las campañas de vacunación.
Palabras clave
Texto completo:
PDF (Português (Brasil))Referencias
Ajzenman, N., Cavalcanti, T., & Da Mata, D. (2020). More Than Words: Leaders’ Speech and Risky Behavior during a Pandemic. SSRN. Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3582908
Allington, D., Duffy, B., Wessely, S., Dhavan, N., & Rubin, J. (2020). Health-protective behaviour, social media usage and conspiracy belief during the COVID-19 public health emergency. Psychological Medicine, 1–7. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S003329172000224X
Almeida, C. (2020). ‘Make science great again’?: o impacto da covid-19 na percepção pública da ciência. Dilemas: Revista de Estudos de Conflito e Controle Social, Rio de Janeiro, Reflexões na pandemia 2020, 1-24. Retrieved from https://www.arca.fiocruz.br/handle/icict/41506
Almeida, A. C. G., Cordeiro, A. J. A., Scorza, F. A., Moret, M. A., Rocha-Filho, T. M. R., & Ramalho, W. M. (2020, 18 de dezembro). Situação da pandemia de COVID-19 no brasil e impactos da campanha de vacinação (Nota técnica no. 7). CoronaVidas. Retrieved from https://coronavidas.net/datascience/situacao-da-pandemia-de-covid-19-no-brasil-18-12-2020/
Bavel, J. J. V., Baicker, K., Boggio, P. S., Capraro, V., Cichocka, A., Cikara, M., … Willer, R. (2020). Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response. Nature Human Behaviour, 4, 460-471. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-0884-z
BBC News Brasil (2020, 25 de março). Coronavírus: postura de Bolsonaro coloca União e Estados em enfrentamento direto. Retrieved from https://www.bbc.com/portuguese/brasil-52042535
Bertin, P., Nera, K., & Delouvée, S. (2020). Conspiracy Beliefs, Rejection of Vaccination, and Support for hydroxychloroquine: A Conceptual Replication-Extension in the COVID-19 Pandemic Context. Frontiers in Psychology, 11(565128). doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.565128
Cardoso, T. (2020, 9 de setembro). Posicionamento da Presidência sobre vacinação repercute em grupos antivacina. Jornal da USP. Retrieved from https://jornal.usp.br/ciencias/posicionamento-da-presidencia-sobre-vacinacao-repercute-em-grupos-antivacina/
Couto, M. T., Barbieri, C. L. A., & Matos, C. C. S. A. (2020). Considerations about COVID-19 impact on the individual-society relationship: from vaccine hesitancy to the clamor for a vaccine. SciELO Preprints. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/SciELOPreprints.1196
Douglas, K. M., Uscinski, J. E., Sutton, R. M., Cichocka, A., Nefes, T., Ang, C. S., & Deravi, F. (2019), Understanding Conspiracy Theories. Political Psychology, 40(S1), 3-35. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12568
Enders, A. M., Uscinski, J. E., Klofstad, C., & Stoler, J. (2020). The different forms of COVID-19 misinformation and their consequences. The Harvard Kennedy School (HKS) Misinformation Review, 1(8). Retrieved from https://nrs.harvard.edu/URN-3:HUL.INSTREPOS:37366466
Escobar, H. (2020, 13 de dezembro). Vacina é assunto da ciência, não da política. Jornal da USP. Retrieved from https://jornal.usp.br/ciencias/vacina-e-assunto-da-ciencia-nao-da-politica/
Freeman, D., Waite, F., Rosebrock, L., Petit, A., Causier, C., East, A., … Lambe, S. (2020). Coronavirus conspiracy beliefs, mistrust, and compliance with government guidelines in England. Psychological Medicine, 1–13. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291720001890
Gloria Filho, M., & Modesto, J. G. (2019). Morality, Activism and Radicalism in the Brazilian Left and the Brazilian Right. Temas Em Psicologia, 27(3), 763-777. doi: https://doi.org/10.9788/TP2019.3-12
Goertzel, T. (1994). Belief in conspiracy theories. Political Psychology, 15(4), 731–742. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/3791630
Hao, K., & Basu, T. (2020, 12 de fevereiro). The coronavirus is the first true social-media “infodemic”. MIT Technology Review. Retrieved from https://www.technologyreview.com/2020/02/12/844851/the-coronavirus-is-the-first-true-social-media-infodemic/
Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford publications.
Hunter, W., & Power, T. J. (2019). Bolsonaro and Brazil’s illiberal backlash. Journal of Democracy, 30(1), 68-82. doi: https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2019.0005
Jaloto, A., Zuanazzi, A. C., & Gonçalves, A. P. (2020). COVID-19: behaviors, agreement with the president’s positions, conspiracy beliefs, and pathological traits. Research Gate. doi: https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.18809.90722
Jolley, D., & Douglas, K. M. (2017). Prevention is better than cure: Addressing anti vaccine conspiracy theories. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 47(8), 459–469. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12453
Lamberty, P., & Imhoff, R. (2018). Powerful pharma and its marginalized alternatives? effects of individual differences in conspiracy mentality on attitudes toward medical approaches. Social Psychology, 49(5), 255–270. doi: https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000347
Mariani, L. A., Gagete-Miranda, J., & Rettl, P. (2020). Words can hurt: How political communication can change the pace of an epidemic. Covid Economics, 1(12), 104–137. CEPR Press. Retrieved from https://cepr.org/sites/default/files/news/CovidEconomics12.pdf
Mian, A., & Khan, S. (2020). Coronavirus: the spread of misinformation. BMC medicine, 18(89), 1-2. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-020-01556-3
Miller, J. (2020). Do COVID-19 Conspiracy Theory Beliefs Form a Monological Belief System? [Special section]. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 53(2), 319-326. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008423920000517
Modesto, J. G., Zacarias, D. O., Galli, L. M., & Neiva, B. A. (2020). COVID-19 and attitudes toward social isolation: The role of political orientation, morality, and fake news. Estudos de Psicologia (Natal), 25(2), 124-132. doi: https://doi.org/10.22491/1678-4669.20200013
Moraes, M. (2020, 27 de agosto). EUA, Brasil e Espanha lideram desinformação contra vacinas da Covid-19. Agência Lupa. Retrieved from https://piaui.folha.uol.com.br/lupa/2020/08/27/coronavirus-vacinas-conspiracao/
Ramos, G., Vieites, Y., Jacob, J., & Andrade, E. B. (2020). Orientação política e apoio ao isolamento social durante a pandemia da COVID-19: evidências do Brasil. Revista de Administração Pública, 54(4), 697-713. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-761220200162x
Sato, A. P. S. (2018). What is the importance of vaccine hesitancy in the drop of vaccination coverage in Brazil?. Revista De Saúde Pública, 52(96). doi: https://doi.org/10.11606/S1518-8787.2018052001199
Silveira, A. C. M., Pippi, J. P., Dalmolin, A., & Rudnick, C. S. (2020). Ciência e disputa de narrativas: a construção da “farsa da Covid-19”. Rizoma, 8(1), 89-105. doi: https://doi.org/10.17058/rzm.v1i1.15318
Tahmasbi, F., Schild, L., Chen, L., Blackburn, J., Stringhini, G., Zhang, Y., & Zannettou, S. (2020). “Go eat a bat, Chang!”: An Early Look on the Emergence of Sinophobic Behavior on Web Communities in the Face of COVID-19. arXiv. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/abs/2004.04046
The Lancet COVID-19 Commissioners, Task Force Chairs, & Commission Secretariat. (2020). Lancet COVID-19 Commission Statement on the occasion of the 75th session of the UN General Assembly. The Lancet, 396(10254), 1102-1124. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31927-9
The Lancet. (2020). COVID-19 in Brazil: “So what?”. The Lancet, 395(10235). doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31095-3
Uscinski, J. E., Enders, A. M., Klofstad, C., Seelig, M., Funchion, J., Everett, C., … Murthi. M. (2020). Why Do People Believe COVID19 Conspiracy Theories? [Special issue]. The Harvard Kennedy School (HKS) Misinformation Review, 1, 1-12. doi: https://doi.org/10.37016/mr-2020-015
van Prooijen, J.-W., & Douglas, K. M. (2017). Conspiracy theories as part of history: The role of societal crisis situations. Memory Studies, 10(3), 323–333. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1750698017701615
van Prooijen, J.-W., & Jostmann, N. B. (2013). Belief in conspiracy theories: The influence of uncertainty and perceived morality. European Journal of Social Psychology, 43(1), 109–115. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.1922
Wood, M. J., Douglas, K. M., & Sutton, R. M. (2012). Dead and alive: Beliefs in contradictory conspiracy theories. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3(6), 767–773. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550611434786
World Health Organization (2020, 11 de março). WHO Director-General’s opening remarks at the media briefing on COVID-19 - 11 March 2020. Retrieved from https://www.who.int/director-general/speeches/detail/who-director-general-s-opening-remarks-at-the-media-briefing-on-covid-19---11-march-2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18256/2175-5027.2021.v13i1.4491
Enlaces refback
- No hay ningún enlace refback.
Copyright (c) 2021 Luccas Moraes Galli, João Gabriel Modesto
ISSN 2175-5027
La Revista de Psicologia da IMED está bajo una licencia de Creative Commons Reconocimiento 4.0 Internacional.
BASES DE DADOS E INDEXADORES
 |  |  | ||
 |  |  | ||
 |  |  | ||
 |  |