Email this article 
Social and Environmental Innovations in Brazilian Siderurgy
Abstract
The economic activity of the industry generates benefits, such as economic growth, and harm, such as waste discarded in the environment. The possibility of mitigating the harms of industrial activity, through sustainable innovations, is positioned as a topic of interest to society. In this context, this research analyzes the scope of socioenvironmental innovations that the Brazilian steel industry implements to mitigate the generation of solid waste. This research was based on a case study at Usiminas, one of the largest steelmakers in South America, using document analysis techniques and interviews with company representatives. The data indicate that through the performance of a multidisciplinary group the company developed four products that use the slag from the oxygen steelmaking as input. Although the product is patented, and its value is negotiated, the business model adopted was designed to contribute to the county. As a counterpart, the municipal beneficiary develops projects to protect water sources. In this way, technological innovations can transform the residue of the industry’s processes into products that benefit the environment and society.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDF (Português (Brasil))References
Aloise, P. G., & Silva, D. F. (2018). Direcionadores de ecoinovação e seus impactos: estudo de caso na Zona Franca de Manaus. Revista de Administração IMED, 8(2), 166-182. https://doi.org/10.18256/2237-7956.2018.v8i2.2913.
Araújo, W. P. D., Lima, M. C. M. C. D., & Souza, S. L. C. (2015). Escória de Aciaria LD para uso como corretivo agrícola. Proceedings of the ABM Week, Annual Meeting, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil, 70.
Arens, M. (2019). Policy support for and R&D activities on digitising the European steel industry. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 143, 244-250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.12.020.
Barbieri, J. C., Vasconcelos, I. F. G., Andreassi, T., & Vasconcelos, F. C. (2010). Innovation and sustainability: new models and propositions. Revista de Administração de Empresas, 50(2), 146-154. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0034-75902010000200002.
Brasil, M. V. O., Abreu, M. C. S., Silva Filho, J. C. L., & Leocádio, A. L. (2016). Relationship between eco-innovations and the impact on business performance: an empirical survey research on the Brazilian textile industry. Revista de Administração, 51(3), 276–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rausp.2016.06.003.
Brazil Steel Institute. (2011). Brazil steel news. Retrieved from http://www.acobrasil.org.br/siderurgiaemfoco/acobrasiinforma_set11_ingles_eletronico.pdf.
Bridgstock, R., Lettice, F., Özbilgin, M. F., & Tatli, A. (2010). Diversity management for innovation in social enterprises in the UK. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 22(6), 557–574. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2010.488404.
Cheng, C. C., & Shiu, E. C. (2012). Validation of a proposed instrument for measuring eco- innovation: an implementation perspective. Technovation, 32(6), 329–344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2012.02.001.
Departamento Nacional de Infraestrutura de Transportes. (2017). Pavimentação rodoviária: Base estabilizada granulometricamente com Açobrita® - especificação de serviço. Retrieved from http://ipr.dnit.gov.br/normas-e-manuais/normas/especificacao-de-servicos-es/dnit-406_2017-es.pdf.
Fundação Renova. (2017). Recuperção de nascentes de água. Retrieved from http://www.fundacaorenova.org/noticia/nova-fase-das-acoes-de-recuperacao-de-nascentes-e-apps-comeca-com-o-apoio-dos-proprietarios-rurais/.
Garcez, M. P., Sbragia, R., & Kruglianskas, I. (2014). Factors for selecting partners in innovation projects: qualitative evidences from non-equity bilateral alliances in the Brazilian petrochemical leader. Revista de Administração e Inovação, 11(2), 241–272. https://doi.org/10.5773/rai.v11i2.1292.
Giorgi, C., dal Palù, D., & Allione, C. (2015). Development and results of a cross border network project, aimed at the engineering of eco-compatible products. Journal of Cleaner Production, 106, 619–631. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.09.078.
Holmes, S., & Smart, P. (2009). Exploring open innovation practice in firm-nonprofit engagements: a corporate social responsibility perspective. R&D Management, 39(4), 394–409. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2009.00569.x.
Kemp, R., & Pearson, P. (2007). Final report MEI project about measuring eco-innovation. Maastricht: UM Merit.
Kushnir, D., Hansen, T., Vogl, V., & Åhman, M. (2020). Adopting hydrogen direct reduction for the Swedish steel industry: a technological innovation system (TIS) study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 242, 118185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118185.
Lee, K-H., & Min, B. (2015). Green R&D for eco-innovation and its impact on carbon emissions and firm performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 108, 534–542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.05.114.
Lins, R. F., & Faria, M. D. F. B. (2018). Governança corporativa nas empresas brasileiras de edificações e construção pesada. Revista de Administração IMED, 8(1), 237-258. https://doi.org/10.18256/2237-7956.2018.v8i1.2544.
Lopez, F. J. D., & Montalvo, C. (2012). The greening of the chemical industry: past, present and challenges ahead. In Sanghi, R., & Singh, V. (Eds.), Green chemistry for environmental remediation. Salem: John Wiley & Sons-Scrivener Publishing LLC. (pp. 35–78).
Machado Junior, C., Souza, M. T. S. D., Bazanini, R., Mantovani, D. M. N., & Furlaneto, C. J. (2018). Social and environmental innovations of Brazilian companies. Revista Ambiente & Água, 13(2), 1–15. http://dx.doi.org/10.4136/ambi-agua.2145
Maurer, Â. M., & Silva, T. N. (2014). Dimensões analíticas para identificação de inovações sociais: evidências de empreendimentos coletivos. Brazilian Business Review, 11(6), 127–150. http://dx.doi.org/10.15728/bbr.2014.11.6.6.
Menezes, D. C. (2019). Organização: em busca de uma definição e sua funcionalidade. Revista de Administração IMED, 9(2), 153-164. https://doi.org/10.18256/2237-7956.2019.v9i2.3097.
Mulgan, G. (2006). The process of social innovation. Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization, 1(2), 145–162. https://doi.org/10.1162/itgg.2006.1.2.145.
Piatak, N. M., Parsons, M. B., & Seal II, R. R. (2015). Characteristics and environmental aspects of slag: a review. Applied Geochemistry, 57, 236–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2014.04.009.
Sausen, F. P., Rossetto, C. R., & Behling, H. P. (2018). Tipologias de inovação:um estudo exploratório em organizações empreendedoras. Revista de Administração IMED, 8(2), 183-202. https://doi.org/10.18256/2237-7956.2018.v8i2.2969.
Shen, J., Zhang, X., Lv, Y., Yang, X., Wu, J., Lin, L., & Zhang, Y. (2019). An improved emergy evaluation of the environmental sustainability of China’s steel production from 2005 to 2015. Ecological Indicators, 103, 55-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.03.051.
State of Minas Gerais – SIAM/MG. (2009). Retrieved from http://www.siam.mg.gov.br/sla/download.pdf?idNorma=9272.
Sverdrup, H. U., Ragnarsdottir, K. V., & Koca, D. (2017). An assessment of metal supply sustainability as an input to policy: security of supply extraction rates, stocks-in-use, recycling, and risk of scarcity. Journal of Cleaner Production, 140, 359–372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.06.085.
Teich, M. Š. (1982). Circulation, transformation, conservation of matter and the balancing of the biological world in the eighteenth century. Ambix, 29(1), 17–28. https://doi.org/10.1179/amb.1982.29.1.17.
Tricker, R. B. (2015). Corporate governance: principles, policies, and practices. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
United Nations. (2017). Estimates of population growth. Retrieved from https://esa.un.org/unpd/wpp/Download/Standard/Population/.
Usiminas – Usinas Siderúrgicas de Minas Gerias. (2017). Retrieved from http://www.usiminas.com/xerimbabo/edicao.html.
Usiminas – Usinas Siderúrgicas de Minas Gerias. (2018). Retrieved from http://www.usiminas.com/blog/caminhos-do-vale-amplia-abrangencia-em-2018/.
van den Bergh, J. C., Truffer, B., & Kallis, G. (2011). Environmental innovation and societal transitions: Introduction and overview. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 1(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2011.04.010.
van Oss, H. G. (2018). Slag, iron and steel. U.S. Geol. Surv. Miner. Yearb, 1, 69.1–69.8.
Vollero, A., Conte, F., Siano, A., & Covucci, C. (2019). Corporate social responsibility information and involvement strategies in controversial industries. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(1), 141-151. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1666.
Wang, W., Zhao, X. Z., Chen, F. W., Wu, C. H., Tsai, S., & Wang, J. (2019). The effect of corporate social responsibility and public attention on innovation performance: evidence from high-polluting industries. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(20), 3939. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16203939.
Yuan, B., & Zhang, Y. (2020). Flexible environmental policy, technological innovation and sustainable development of China’s industry: the moderating effect of environment regulatory enforcement. Journal of Cleaner Production, 243, 118543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118543.
Zhu, X., Zeng, A., Zhong, M., Huang, J., & Qu, H. (2019). Multiple impacts of environmental regulation on the steel industry in China: a recursive dynamic steel industry chain CGE analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 210, 490-504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.350.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18256/2237-7956.2020.v10i2.3789
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2021 Celso Machado Junior, Igor Venâncio Andrés Lebedev Martinez, Orlando Roque da Silva, Roberto Bazanini
Revista de Administração IMED (RAIMED) ISSN: 2237-7956 Programa de Pós-Graduação em Administração (PPGA/Atitus)
Atitus Educação - Business School – www.imed.edu.br – Rua Senador Pinheiro, 304 – Bairro Vila Rodrigues – 99070-220 – Passo Fundo/RS – Brasil Tel.: +55 51 4004-4818
