Evaluation of the surface roughness of a composite resin using different polishers
Abstract
Introduction: The surface roughness is defined by the surface of a restorative material after the finishing and polishing steps, and is affected by the properties of the resinous composite as well as by the instruments used to perform the polishing. Objectives: To evaluate the surface roughness of a polished nano-hybrid composite resin with different polishing systems by atomic force microscopy (MFA) and polishing analysis by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Materials and Methods: the factors under study are polishing systems at three levels: Enhance (Dentsply), Ultra-Gloss (American Burrs) and Dura-Gloss (American Burrs). The experimental units are composed of 30 specimens in conventional nano-hybrid composite resin, divided randomly into 3 groups (n = 10). The G1 Group received treatment with the single-stage polishing system: Dura-Gloss, Group G2, multi-step polishing system: Ultra-Gloss and Group G3 was treated with the single-stage polishing system: Enhance. The quantitative response variable is given by the surface roughness evaluated by atomic force microscopy (MFA). Results: the results showed that the systems of Dura-Gloss and Ultra-Gloss polishers presented similar surface roughness (p = 0.201) and differed statistically from the Enhance system (p = 0.023, Ultra-Gloss and p = 0.000, Dura- Gloss), which presented higher surface roughness for the nano-hybrid composite resin. Conclusion: Dura-Gloss and Ultra-Gloss polishers have a higher polishing capacity of nano-hybrid composite resin.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDF (Português (Brasil))References
Kocaağaoğlu H, Aslan T, Gürbulak A, Albayrak H, Taşdemir Z, Gumus H. Efficacy of polishing kits on the surface roughness and color stability of different composite resins. Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice. 2017;20:557-65.
Nair VS, Sainudeen S, Padmanabhan P, Vijayashankar LV, Sujathan U, Pillai R. Three-dimensional evaluation of surface roughness of resin composites after finishing and polishing. Journal Conservative Dentistry. 2016;19:91-5.
Chour RG, Moda A, Arora A, Arafath MY, Shetty VK, Rishal Y. Comparative evaluation of effect of different polishing systems on surface roughness of composite resin: An in vitro study. Journal of International Society of Preventive and Community Dentistry. 2016;6:166-70.
Patel B, Chhabra N, Jain D. Effect of different polishing systems on the surface roughness of nano-hybrid composites. Journal Conservative Dentistry. 2016;19:37-40.
Eden E, Cogulu D, Attin T. The Effect of Finishing and Polishing Systems on Surface Roughness, Microhardness and Microleakage of a Nanohybrid Composite. Journal of International Dental and Medical Research. 2012;5:155-160.
Daud A, Gray G, Lynch CD, Wilson NHF, Blum IR. A randomised controlled study on the use of finishing and polishing systems on different resin composites using 3D contact optical profilometry and scanning electron microscopy. A journal of Dentistry. 2018;71:25-30.
Madhyastha PS, Hegde S, Srikant N, Kotian R, Iyer SS. Effect of finishing/polishing techniques and time on surface roughness of esthetic restorative materials. Dental Research Journal. 2017;14:326-30.
Alawjali SS, Lui JL. Effect of one-step polishing system on the color stability of nanocomposites. Journal of Dentistry. 2013;41:53-61.
Senawongse P, Pongprueksa P. Surface roughness of nanofill and nanohybrid resin composites after polishing and brushing. Journal of Esthetic & Restorative Dentistry. 2007;19:265-73.
Nasoohi N, Hoorizad M, Tabatabaei SF. Effects of Wet and Dry Finishing and Polishing on Surface Roughness and Microhardness of Composite Resins. Journal of Dentistry, Tehran University of Medical Sciences. 2017;14:69-7.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18256/2238-510X.2020.v9i1.4086
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Journal of Oral Investigations - JOI (ISSN 2238-510X)
Faculdade Meridional – IMED – www.imed.edu.br
Rua Senador Pinheiro, 304 – Bairro Cruzeiro, 99070-220 – Passo Fundo - RS - Brasil
Tel.: +55 54 3045 6100
Indexadores
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ||
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ||
![]() | ![]() | |||
| ||||